Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 "Pandas" listed at Redirects for discussion  
1 comment  




2 Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2023  
2 comments  




3 Subspecies  
7 comments  




4 Semi-protected edit request on 28 September 2023  
2 comments  




5 Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2023  
3 comments  




6 Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2023  
2 comments  




7 Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2023  
2 comments  




8 The closest word for Panda is the Nepali word "Panja" and not "Ponya".  
3 comments  




9 GA Review  
14 comments  




10 Did you know nomination  
5 comments  




11 Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2024  
3 comments  













Talk:Giant panda




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Good articleGiant panda has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.
Did You KnowIn the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 24, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
April 29, 2024Good article nomineeListed

Did You KnowAfact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 3, 2024.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the distinctive coloration of the giant panda appears to serve as camouflage in both winter and summer?
In the news News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on July 26, 2010, and September 6, 2016.
Current status: Good article

[edit]

The redirect Pandas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 22 § Pandas until a consensus is reached. Bonoahx (talk) 22:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2023

[edit]

change intermission to intromission in the Reproduction and Parenting section. 142.113.214.19 (talk) 00:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. "intermission" does not appear at all in the article that I can find. In which sentence do you see it? Cannolis (talk) 00:54, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subspecies

[edit]

3 subspecies are listed, but I can find no reference anywhere to "a.m.hastorni".

Unless someone can point to a valid reference, it should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.30.52 (talk) 15:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like that was added by Super Dromaeosaurus with this edit. It's been over five years, but perhaps they can recall where that information was from? —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 15:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No idea. I probably just copied it from Spanish Wikipedia. The subspecies is listed there too. I am not opposed to its removal. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 16:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Looking at es-wiki, Sahaquiel9102 added the subspecies to the infobox with this edit, but I don't see A.m. hastorni) in the text before or after that addition. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to remove it at this point. es-wiki had a page [for Ailuropoda melanoleuca hastorni that's been deleted three times as vandalism. On en-wiki, this 2017 edittoAiluropoda removed the mention of A.m. hastorni due to a lack of any sources that didn't seem to trace back to Wikipedia. That same edit shows that the common name being given for that subspecies was "Eastern panda," which doesn't help. zh-wiki gives 云南大熊猫 as the common name, which was added with this edit. That translates to Yunnan giant panda, but the only mentions to a Yunnan panda are connected to a 2015 poaching instance. While that incident showed the pandas to be present in an area where they were previously thought to have been wiped out, there's no indication that they are or were a different subspecies. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe they should be removed from the other Wikipedias as well. If it's a legit subspecies, someone should restore it eventually anyway. It's not like this kind of things are so obscure. It's likely a hoax. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 23:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Well, I just ran through the full list of sister project articles from the sidebar. Most didn't list subspecies, a lot only had A. m. melanoleuca and A. m. qinlingensis. I removed A. m. hastorni from infoboxes in nine projects (I couldn't remove the tenth instance — zh-wiki, where the page is protected from me editing it). Hopefully the English-language edit comment (or a Google Translate version) will help avoid reverts... I could have missed one or two where the Latin name was rendered in local characters or where the subspeieces information was in a collapsed or otherwise inobvious place. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 18:53, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 September 2023

[edit]
172.127.157.33 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC) Panda bears are vurnerable[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. If you mean to note their conservation status as a vulnerable species, that is already covered in the article.  BelowTheSun  (TC) 17:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2023

[edit]

Change US$1.5 billion to US $1.5 billion 172.127.157.33 (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

change it pls it makes no sense Skmdasdadasdk (talk) 17:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: this is the correct format. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2023

[edit]

change Predators. Although adult giant pandas have few natural predators other than humans, young cubs are vulnerable to attacks by snow leopards, yellow-throated martens, eagles, feral dogs, and the Asian black bear. to Predators. Although adult giant pandas have few natural predators other than humans, young cubs are vulnerable to attacks by snow leopards, yellow-throated martens, eagles, feral dogs, and the Asian black bear. Sub-adults weighing up to 50 kg (110 lb) may be vulnerable to predation by leopards. Skmdasdadasdk (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. UtherSRG (talk) 17:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2023

[edit]

change giant panda

to panda bear 172.127.157.33 (talk) 16:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. UtherSRG (talk) 16:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The closest word for Panda is the Nepali word "Panja" and not "Ponya".

[edit]

Hi, I have already tried editing the word "Ponya" to the correct term "Panja" multiple times, only to have it reverted by the editors. I am extremely sorry if I do not know how to properly cite the source. I want to do my best to get this information corrected as the word "ponya" does not exist in the Nepali language. The closest word is "Ponja", which is just an incorrect way of spelling "Panja".

Panja refers to claws, palm or fang. The word "panja" is also used in the Hindi language.

I do not know how to make the proper edit. If any editor is reading this, can you please edit the word "ponya" to "panja" and cite the source necessary?

Some sources are:

https://dictionary.nepaliexpert.com/search/term/panjA

https://www.shabdkosh.com/search-dictionary?lc=hi&sl=en&tl=hi&e=%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE FateXBlood (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source you provided is not reliable. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 14:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See Red panda#Etymology and respective reliable sources therein. BhagyaMani (talk) 14:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Giant panda/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 16:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 06:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I should have a review written for this in about a week or so. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Your time is always appreciated. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 15:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Thebiguglyalien: You free? Wolverine XI (talk to me) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked at the sources and I'm working my way through the prose. I should have it all posted today or tomorrow. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I'll just wait. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 14:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wolverine XI I've posted the review below. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thebiguglyalien: I've addressed every comment. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 18:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well-written

General:

Taxonomy:

Distribution:

Description:

Ecology:

Behavior:

Human interaction:

Conservation:

Verifiable with no original research

Spot checks:

Broad in its coverage

Major aspects:

Minor details:

Neutral
Stable

No recent disputes.

Illustrated

All images are licensed and captioned. The only change that needs to be made is that the caption "feeding panda" is vague. Maybe "A panda feeding on bamboo"?

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promotedbyBruxton talk 02:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

)

Created by Wolverine XI (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Wolverine XI (talk to me) 10:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Earwig shows a very high score for some sites, but they seem to be WP mirrors. Everything else is fine. AryKun (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolverine XI and AryKun: The article was created in 2001 so created was not correct for the nomination. It is GA. I think the 90% Earwig appears to be a site that copied Wikipedia. Bruxton (talk) 02:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't notice that it was nominated for creation; I'd been following the GA review so I assumed that it had been nominated for that. AryKun (talk) 07:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2024

[edit]

The below is to make the wording a little better and reduce run on

Change

“The shoot is an important energy source, as it contains starch and is 32% protein, hence pandas evolved the ability to effectively digest starch.”

To

“Pandas evolved the ability to effectively digest starch, making the shoot an important energy source. Though mostly starch, bamboo shoots are 32% protein, and therefore a good substitute for a carnivorous diet.”

Or something like that. LPantalons (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done UtherSRG (talk) 20:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a source for bamboo shoots being 32% protein? Seems more likely to be 3.2%. Derryp (talk) 22:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Giant_panda&oldid=1233676308"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Natural sciences good articles
Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
Wikipedia In the news articles
GA-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in Biology and health sciences
GA-Class level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
GA-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
GA-Class mammal articles
Top-importance mammal articles
WikiProject Mammals articles
GA-Class China-related articles
High-importance China-related articles
GA-Class China-related articles of High-importance
WikiProject China articles
Etymology Task Force etymologies
Spoken Wikipedia requests
 



This page was last edited on 10 July 2024, at 09:31 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki