Contents

Talk:Gnosticism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gnosticism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Religion Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Philosophy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Greece Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following is currently the second sentence of the article:

• Viewing material existence as flawed or evil, Gnostic cosmogony generally presents a distinction between a supreme, hidden God and a malevolent lesser divinity (sometimes associated with the Yahweh of the Old Testament)^[1] who is responsible for creating the material universe.

This sentence states that the Demiurge-figure described in many texts deemed Gnostic is sometimes associated with the God of the Hebrew Bible. The claim that the authors of Gnostic texts were making such an association isn't particularly controversial - they indeed often are linked, and several Nag Hammadi texts are pretty explicit about making such a link.

However, I note that the source cited here is a philosophical essay by Georges Bataille, a philosopher (and a rather unusual one at that) with no specific scholarly expertise in Gnostic texts. Bataille himself in the source cited doesn't cite this claim. The source in general is - in all fairness to Bataille - not supposed to be a scholarly text on the subject of Gnosticism so much as it is a philosophical reflection which "bounces off of" certain notions the author has about Gnosticism as its starting point. Such an essay is a perfectly appropriate citation in a section on responses to or philosophical interpretations of Gnosticism - it is not however a reliable source for making general claims about Gnosticism. It was not a strong source of factual information on the topic at its time of writing in 1930; it certainly isn't now. The fact that Bataille alone might associate the Demiurge with Yahweh is insufficient to warrant the mention of a such an association in the opening statements of the article.

I don't take much issue with the actual statement or its phrasing here - but to my mind it requires a citation from a better quality and more contemporary source.

--Pseudo-Pseudo-Dionysius (talk) 21:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- see The Gnostic Gospels by Elaine Pagels, pp. 33-35. She cites "Hypostasis of the Archons," "On the Origin of the World," and the "Secret Book of John." While these texts do not mention Yahwey by name, they characterize him as "I am a jealous God, and there is no other God beside me," clearly a reference to the God of the Old Testament. - Epinoia (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was aware that the references to said figure were there in the primary texts; it was just the quality of the citation used I was taking issue with. The Pagels citation you provide works, and of course she's a much more authoritative source. I've swapped out the citation just now. Thanks for the help. Pseudo-Pseudo-Dionysius (talk) 17:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the line "Jewish Gnosticism with a focus on Sophia was active by 90 A.D." under the subheading "Sophia", I'm having a very difficult time finding a source to verify this information-- I'm considering removing it until such a time as a suitable citation can be found. Though there is a potential string of connections through The Wisdom of Soloman, it was likely written around 50 B.C., so the timing doesn't quite fit. Am I missing anything obvious? I will admit this is not my area of expertise. TempusAstra042 (talk) 12:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my area of expertise either. I myself wouldn't go fussing around with little details like that about which I don't know much to begin with. Why not leave it for someone with knowledge, or at leat enough interest to research the detail? Thank you, warshy ^(¥¥) 18:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following sentence was just added to that same section by Ctschroeder: "She is occasionally referred to by the Hebrew equivalent of Achamoth." As far as I know this must be some confusion by someone who does not know Hebrew. The word as written above and in the article is not a known/existing Hebrew word, as far as I know. warshy ^(¥¥) 01:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 12 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Todd Andrea (article contribs). Peer reviewers: StrawwberryShortcake, Lancelotsdaughter.

— Assignment last updated by Ctschroeder (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In a supposedly FACTUAL page about Gnostic Christianity, why has it not been mentioned (in ANY way) that Gnostic Christianity was the ORIGINAL Christianity? Nor is it mentioned that the reason most Gnostic information was destroyed (and Gnostic people killed) was because the Literalists didn't want people to know the truth: that THEY were lying! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diablo666Daemon666 (talk • contribs) 11:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]