| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gomburza article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 17, 2011 and February 17, 2013. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The last paragraph seems rather unrelated to the subject. Should I omit this? Also, the second paragraph seems a bit inaccurate to me, in particular, its explanation of how the deaths of the priests caused the unification of the different groups. Migs 06:46, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This is an interesting article, but it needs to cite at least one or two sources, and more importantly, we need to change the language to make it more neutral. Here are a few of the many examples of non-neutral language, taken from the beginning of the article: "trumped-up charges" (might be justifiable, if universally agreed in sources), "suffered martyrdom" (instead of "was executed"), "apparently just the pretext needed", "minions" (instead of "followers"), etc. David 16:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Did all of the above; hope the article is now satisfactory. Added some new stuff too. -- • Kurt Guirnela • ‡ Talk 09:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The bit about Carlos Maria de la Torre doesn't make sense. If you check de la Torre's wiki page, it says he was born a year after the 3 priests were executed. Either the (A) the link is bad, and should be to a different de la Torre; (B) the date for the Gomburza executions is wrong; or (C) de la Torre's chronology is all wrong. I am almost positive it's (A), but I figured I'd defer to someone more knowledgable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.96.33 (talk) 03:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The execution of GomBurZa is deeply embedded in the Philippine Hostory. RIPHKami (talk) 06:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:42, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at photos of Jacinto, he looks like the man on the left, not the right. I could be wrong though 2600:1009:B126:FCD3:4421:E8A2:6440:C517 (talk) 19:51, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
