Contents

Talk:Gone Girl (film)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force. United States: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force. Missouri Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. stateofMissouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. California: Los Angeles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofCalifornia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 6 times. The weeks in which this happened: September 28 to October 4, 2014 (15th) October 5 to 11, 2014 (5th) October 12 to 18, 2014 (7th) October 19 to 25, 2014 (22nd) December 21 to 27, 2014 (18th) December 28, 2014 to January 3, 2015 (25th)

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2021 and 30 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bambiwikipawdia. Peer reviewers: Jackkirk18, Bknight18, Alexisanderson89.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Dallas Morning News made a video about the movie, but I am not sure if the video is still accessible. URL reference: http://web.archive.org/web/20141005152016/http://popcultureblog.dallasnews.com/2014/10/reel-genius-the-mischievous-thrills-of-gone-girl-which-may-keep-you-from-ever-getting-married.html/ WhisperToMe (talk) 05:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe Wikipedia standards establish somewhere between 400 and 700? I've left it in 710 but I'm sure it can be trimmed further. AnyDosMilVint (talk) 12:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AnyDosMilVint, I take it that you are not new to editing Wikipedia.

Regarding my revert, I reverted back to this version, which reverted more than one editor (not just you) and took away 118 characters. You then restored to 118 characters, stating that the plot summary was too long and that it "missed some important bits." And you then cut it by 353 characters. If anything, your edit may have cut something important. For example, I'm not sure if the life insurance aspect should be mentioned. It's been a long time since I've watched this film. As for the range given by the WP:Film plot guideline, it clearly states "unless the film's structure is unconventional [...] or unless the plot is too complicated to summarize in this range." It also states, "Discuss with other editors to determine if a summary cannot be contained within the proper range." WP:Film editors have consistently been clear that we do not have to be strict with this guideline. It's a guideline. Not a policy. Many Wikipedia film plot summaries go a little over the 700 range without any issues. We don't trim out important content. What to retain or cut from this article's plot section has been discussed times before, but it may be that all your edits are for the best. If you can get the section to 700 or under without cutting important detail, feel free. That shouldn't be difficult since the section likely has a word or two it doesn't need. If I object to anything else you cut, I'll note so on the talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 15:10, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am actually new to Wiki (which I assume accounts for my multiple edits instead of one); I tentatively tried other film plots and they had this 700 word rule in them in their, which is why I thought it would be universal. The life insurance bit I assumed could be seen as embedded in the generic statement "her murder, whose motive she made seem to be money-related", same as the gambling thing she says in passing in her flashback/confession to the audience. I also felt the need to write the primary motivation for going back to Missouri (namely his mother's cancer) but that added even more bulk to the text so I didn't, ditto for the fact that Nick is out on bond when Amy comes back to him. These things can be seen in the plot for the novel, but if anyone wants to add them to the film plot to make it more comprehensive and the 700-word rule is not set on stone, that's perfectly fine by me. I think I've contributed enough to this article for now. AnyDosMilVint (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article really need a section on, "fashion"? It's not as if this film is known especially for its costume design.

This feels to me as if superfluous and inappropriate.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 1 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vesquilin21 (article contribs).

Psychological thriller it may be, but I also believe this movie has too many blatant comedic elements to not include that it is also, at the very least, a black comedy. Agrudle (talk) 03:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]