The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Troubles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)
Neutrality: All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belfast, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the City of Belfast, Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.BelfastWikipedia:WikiProject BelfastTemplate:WikiProject BelfastBelfast-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Unionism in Ireland, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Unionism in IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Unionism in IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Unionism in IrelandUnionism in Ireland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
It is requested that an imageorphotographofGood Friday Agreementbeincluded in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The UN Peacemaker site, which used to be the source of the link to the GFA full text is down, so I have replaced it with a link from the Northern Ireland Office.
I came here looking for a detailed account of the negotiations that led to the implementatio of the GFA, but could find neither that nor a linke to where it might be found. Is there such a thing? If not, could we not do with one? Cooke (talk) 13:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The text of the Agreement does not seem to give it a title, but simply make reference to the parties. When the Agreement was signed, the impression given in the media was that it was known as the Good Friday Agreement. Since the Conservative Party came to office again in the UK, however, the term Belfast Agreement seems to have become quite widely current as well. One can imagine that the unionist movement, being preponderantly Presbyterian in religion, might see the reference to Good Friday as offensively Catholic (though my understanding is that Presbyterians also mark the passion of Christ on Good Friday), and that the close Parliamentary relationship between the Conservatives and the DUP might cause a wider preference for the term "Belfast Agreement". But I would suggest that this article give a little more information on the history of the term "Belfast Agreement" in this context. Deipnosophista (talk) 12:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The text of the agreement is headed "The Belfast Agreement: An Agreement Reached at the Multi-Party Talks on Northern Ireland". It very quickly became known as "the Good Friday Agreement", and it is still called that by most people today, but there have always been those that used "Belfast Agreement". I don't think that anybody of any church would find the words Good Friday "offensively Catholic", but I am open to correction. Scolaire (talk) 15:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The PDF you shared is the Agreement as it was presented to UK Parliament. The UK government refers to the Agreement as the "Belfast Agreement", but the Agreement isn't bilaterally called that. This version provided by Ireland's government is titled "The Agreement", which from what I've seen is generally considered the more neutral title (though from what I've seen the Good Friday Agreement is the most common).
The article currently refers to the Agreement by a mix of "Good Friday Agreement" and "Belfast Agreement" seemingly arbitrarily. I think this could potentially cause some confusion. I think it might be beneficial to standardize the name in one of three ways:
Refer to the agreement as the Good Friday Agreement throughout the article, as it is the most common name;
Refer to the agreement as the Good Friday Agreement in most cases, but as the Belfast Agreement when discussing unionist or British perspectives;
Refer to the agreement as "the Agreement" whenever it wouldn't cause too much ambiguity. In this case it would make sense to add "or simply the Agreement" or similar to the lead as a name of the Agreement (which I think should already be the case— thoughts? Should this be a separate proposal?)
A Ctrl-F for "agreement" showed that the word appeared 146 times, the vast majority as simply "the agreement" (and without the lead needing to say that "the Agreement" is a name for the Agreement). "Good Friday Agreement" appeared 21 times, and "Belfast Agreement" 16 times. "Belfast Agreement" should be changed to "Good Friday Agreement" in the nine cases where it appears outside the refs and the first sentence, since it is the title of the article, and the most common name. Tailoring the name occasionally to suit "unionist or British perspectives" makes no sense. Scolaire (talk) 11:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While I acknowledge that the article uses "the Agreement" a lot without it being given as a name in the lead, I think that enough sources [1][2][3] clarify "the Agreement" to be an accepted name for the Agreement that I think adding it to the lead should be considered. Should I add this as a separate proposal, though?— I'm still learning the conventions. Placeholderer (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, those sources say "or simply the Agreement", but that doesn't mean that adding it here will improve the article. As I've often said, WP:V says that everything in the article should be supported by reliable sources, not that everything in reliable sources must be added to the article.
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
