Contents

Talk:Goshen, New York

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles New York (state) Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofNew York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Communities and locations in the Town of Goshen[edit]

I deleted this section as many of the locations mentioned are either developments or irrelevant, as most were named after railroad intersections that no longer exist (Kipps, and Finnegans Corners being prime examples of this). The listing of "Axworthy Lane" was a hold-over from years-old vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.115.236 (talk) 03:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from the WP vandalism, with all due respect, I don't agree with this philosophy. If a settlement is historically mentioned over and over in newspapers, church records, and other documents, like Finnegan's Corners is, I'd like to see it included. I search for these historic NYS settlements in WP all the time when trying to find locations mentioned. French's Gazeteer doesn't have all of NY's settlements listed, after all, and is much more cumbersome to search through than WP. These Towns all have long, rich histories that I'd hate to see truncated.

Thanks.

68.197.49.1 (talk) 23:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WP article on the "Town of Wawayanda" also claims Pellets Island. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wawayanda,_New_York

I can't find a map clear enough to differentate. (I'm having a hard time tonight with Acme Mapper - their TOPO version has NYS Towns.)

Also, is the "Howells" you've listed the same Howells as the one along Rt 211 roughly between Middletown, Otisville, and Bloomingburg? If so, I think you need to rethink your placement of this hamlet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.49.1 (talk) 22:54, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Goshen, New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov/tohttp://factfinder2.census.gov/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2014/SUB-EST2014.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.htmltohttp://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov/tohttp://factfinder2.census.gov/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]