This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
I'm really not a stickler for British English (and certainly not looking for a spelling war) but if the intent of this article is to be in British English, there's a couple of changes that I'd like to suggest:
From what I heard in IRC, "womanizing" is actually debatable. Apparently Oxford's university press prefers the spelling with a z. The other ones you can change by yourself, you know. Mike H(Talking is hot) 00:36, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
The debate over '-ize' vs. '-ise' endings in British spelling rages among pedants. OUP house style is to have -ize, and I generally prefer it, but it does create difficulties with some words such as 'advertise' which never take -ize because they are from a different stem. See American and British English spelling differences. David | Talk08:48, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I've revised the tense in the article to make it present instead of past. Particularly in the 'premise' section, it sounded odd to refer to the storyline in the past tense. The same should be done to the 'plot' section, but I've run out of time.MArcane03:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article claims that Mike Berry was the only non-returning cast member. If so, why is Trevor Bannister never mentioned? I also see no reference to Arthur English.
The article plot contains a sentence referring to Mrs. Slocombe's cat, saying incorrectly that this is the first time we've seen it. Actually, we did see Tiddles in the original series, at least in prop form. I actually believe we did see a live Tiddles in the original series as well, but I'm not in a position to re-watch the whole thing to find out which episode. Perhaps someone else? 24.57.239.43 (talk) 02:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hurray: You can watch the whole series now online!
The whole series (All twelve episodes) can be seen (For free) on YouTube, in reasonable (VHS) Quality.
Sorry for not signing this entry.
What a stupid idea to use Tildes for that - not everybody uses those awful machines called 'Windows-PC's),
en they're to be found nowhere (Or god knows by what key-combination) on a MAC-keyboard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.200.56.102 (talk) 02:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any particular reason why this show only had two series? Scheduling conflicts? Poor ratings? Creators didn't have more material for the setting? Cast issues? Dalton Imperial (talk) 16:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]