Contents

Talk:Grapher

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grapher article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Apple Inc. Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is a great program for educators and students. I need some help creating slope fields with this program. Any help would be appreciated. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.36.154.179 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 2005 October 31.

[I would like to find some better documentation of what grapher can do. The provided documentation is, um, sparse to phrase it charitably] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.29.214.25 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 2005 September 9.

I am interested in using Grapher to display rectangular solids and would appreciate assistance with the formula.

The program is cool and easy to use! Is there a version for Windows available?

I agree, it's a really fantastic application, easy and light-weight.

All known French & English documentation (including a new 83 pages manual, last edition April 16th 2014 by Mr. Yves Barois), downloadable freely on
 http://y.barois.free.fr/grapher/
A lot of new examples on this website which is free of advertising.
Yves Barois  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.65.109.155 (talk) 23:06, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] 

General notice for editors: the link you have provided is out of date. Someone fix, if you can Xbony2 (talk) 01:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grapher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170711203315/http://guides.macrumors.com/Graphertohttp://guides.macrumors.com/Grapher

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plenty of edits are left unreverted with "citation needed" flaws. Grapher's many, many bugs are trivially easy to verify. And I have a citation but not the time at this moment to look it up and include it.

So there is no good reason to remove that section, unless you are part of Apple's public relations team.50.205.142.35 (talk) 19:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the Features section should also be removed, since it has no citations, either.

Right?50.205.142.35 (talk) 13:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]