A fact from Great Lavra Bell Tower appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 November 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Kudos Dima! How about DYKing that "The Great Lavra Belltower was the highest free-standing belltower at the time of its construction in 1731-1745"? --Irpen08:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't forget to specify the country in which it was the highest. Also, did it occur to anyone that other lavras may also have a "great belltower"? --Ghirla-трёп-21:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I think that it would be a good DYK suggestion. But how about:
...that the clocks on the Great Lavra Belltower have only stopped once during their existance: when the nearby Dormition Cathedral of the Pechersk Lavra was Blown up by army forces?
I left a footnote at the bottom of the article just now, that it is unclear who blew up the cathedral. It was apparently mined by Soviets, and destroyed by Germans, but still, I remember hearing that the Germans blame the Soviets for the destruction of the cathedral and vice versa... Have you guys heard of this, or am I mistaken?? —dima/s-ko/22:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If I recall correctly, this question has never been resolved. The Soviets always blamed the Germans, while the Germans reported that there was an explosion and two soldiers in Soviet uniform running from the cathedral. Whether these were real Soviet soldiers or the Nazis masquerading as such has never been answered. Some important Nazi figure (I forget who) should have been visiting the lavra at the time of the explosion, so the Soviet motivation was obvious. Correct me if I'm wrong. --Ghirla-трёп-09:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes that is what I have heard... but it was the then Czecho-Slovakian president Jozef Tiso who had been visiting the Lavra. But yes it still remains a mystery. Well what do you guys think we should choose as a DYK suggestion? I think the clock-one suggested by me is pretty good and that it was the tallest building during its construction in Russian Empire. —dima/s-ko/17:44, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another DYK suggestion; it combines both of the previous suggestions:
...that the clocks on the Great Lavra Belltower, once the highest free-standing belltower at the time of its construction, have only stopped once during their existance: when the nearby Dormition Cathedral of the Pechersk Lavra was blown up by army forces?
...that the clocks on the Great Lavra Belltower, once the highest free-standing belltower at the time of its construction in 1731-1745, have only stopped once during their existance: when the nearby Dormition Cathedral of the Kiev Pechersk Lavra was blown up during the Second World War?
Sorry for not answering right away, as I was busy. I think this suggestion is better than the one I gave. I will go and suggest the newest one, as we are running out of time. Thanks, —dima/s-ko/04:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
-"Ever since that time, the clock has never needed any repairs again."
-"It has never needed any repairs again ever since."
Seriously? No repairs at all or no major repairs? Do regular maintenance count as repairs? Perhaps it should be rephrased to:
-"...has never needed any major repairs again ever since."
Note: the sentence used to read "Since that time, the clock has never been repaired again." which I changed to the above version (without the addition of the word 'major') which I think is much clearer context-wise.
Another thing:
-"The clock's mechanism is so accurate, that it does not surpass ten seconds behind nor ten seconds over."
I'm not a clock-sort of person, but I believe the better way of phrasing it would be something like: "The clock's mechanism is accurate 'to a sixth (1/6) of a minute' -or- 'up to 10 seconds'". I'm not sure how to properly word it, as I am not certain what the technical term should be.
It should be phrased in seconds because that makes the point more clearly. Fractions of a minute are not SI units, and many people don't like unnecessary fractions. --B.d.mills23:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to:
-"The clock's mechanism is very accurate; up to within 10 seconds"
Still not sure if the phrasing is correct though. Any advice would be much appreciated.
There is redundancy in both the original and revised versions.
-"Since that time, the clock has never needed any repairs."
That would make the point.
Vanwaffle15:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
On the section of the three bells being removed, I have made a change to the grammar but the language still sounds awkward. Any suggestions on the grammar there? Fundamentaldan 14:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
I should clarify and state that this is the third tier section I am talking about. Fundamentaldan14:32, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Great Lavra Bell Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
