Contents

Talk:Greater Orlando

	This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Florida Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move proposal: Greater Orlando

[edit]

Since Greater Orlando is the most common name for the MSA, I was thinking of moving the article back to Greater Orlando, in line with many similar metro area articles. --Kitch ^{(Talk : Contrib)} 15:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings -- there has been a wild week of reverts and blocks going on with the Orlando-area attraction pages. Does anyone here have an opinion on removing the Walt Disney World Resort reference from this page as well, as some users are claiming that WDW isn't "near Orlando" but rather in Bay Lake or Lake Buena Vista (depending on their mood at the time of the edit)? Full discussion taking place all over, but has since joined up at Talk:Walt Disney World Resort. Cheers! SpikeJones (talk) 22:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should we be counting CDP places that aren't incorporated as suburbs? My thought is no. Frank0051 (talk) 02:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed we have started to do this in the Greater Tampa and Greater Miami sections as well. If it is agreed upon that we should be putting CDPs, can we come up with some type of uniform way to distinguish between incorporated and non-incorporated areas? Frank0051 (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe the recent edits by Artystyk386 are an improvement. First, the wording is substantially less clear. The U.S. Census Bureau doesn't define MSAs, the Office of Management and Budget does. Lines like "As of 2010, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the population of Greater Orlando is 2,134,411, an increase of 51,990 new residents between 2009 and 2010" are just too wordy. Additionally, the edit moves the article title to after the unwieldy MSA name. The intro could use some work, but this isn't the way to go.Cúchullain ^t/c 14:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is the criteria for the other cities on the infobar/sidebar? For instance, I see Altamonte Springs, Oviedo, etc. Should it be by population, notability, or is it just random? Frank0051 (talk) 05:22, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO all the links on this page are spam. Anyone else got an opinion? Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe http://www.visitorlando.com/ is ok. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greater Orlando. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150202164411/http://westorlandonews.com/2012/03/12/dr-suns-monument-unveiled-at-orlando-chinatown/tohttp://westorlandonews.com/2012/03/12/dr-suns-monument-unveiled-at-orlando-chinatown/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greater Orlando. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130117104720/http://www.cityoforlando.net/elected/mayor/soc04_medical.htmtohttp://www.cityoforlando.net/elected/mayor/soc04_medical.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]