Contents

Talk:Greenergy

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Advert

[edit]

Greenergy Page: Not an advertAlexis payne (talk) 14:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why has this page been highlighted as an advert? All achievements and claims made regarding Greenergy are referenced to the third party sources. Remove this tag. Alexis payne (talk) 14:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greenergy Page: This page is not an advert. All claims regarding Greenergy's achievements are verified by reference to third party sources. Please remove this claim immediately. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexis payne (talk • contribs) 07:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid to say it, but it reads like an advertisement. It's worded as such, also, with sections that say "Who is Greenergy?" and "What does Greenergy do?". This seems like it's more appropriate for an "About Us" page on Greenergy's web site than a Wikipedia article IMO. –MuZemike 08:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The headings have been modified accordingly. The content however is 1. verifiable - all claims relating to Greenergy are verifiable by third party references provided. 2. The information covered is no more inappropriate than other companies pages on wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexis payne (talk • contribs) 13:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is still a blatant promotion for the company and in no way resembles a neutral encyclopedic article. -- œ^™ 15:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators willbeblocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Crow^Caw 23:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Greenergy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110716071854/http://www.simonstorage.com/htm/downloads/SimonNewsletterJanuary2007.pdftohttp://www.simonstorage.com/htm/downloads/SimonNewsletterJanuary2007.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]