This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
How are you supposed to trust any of this when some of it is so obviously wrong! Romanian orthodox church! pah! sure the obvious wrongness will be corrected sooner or later, leaving just those errors which are plausible, which is hardly an improvement!
If there was no wikipedia there would be something better, properly fact checked!
Can we have some references (issue number, page number?) for the arson claims in Private Eye? They don't put full text online, so I can't find it there. This is pretty inflamatory (bad pun, yes) stuff, so needs to be referenced. Might be worth explaining "tired and emotional" ;) Shermozle11:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The claims keep on getting removed: there's absolutely no way to verify them until something is published online, or at least until someone takes the time to trawl through back issues of Private Eye. I will relent and leave the page as it is, although I'd much rather see this entry be as detailed as possible, but hey, it's no skin off my balls either way. Driller thriller19:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, here's a source for the claims, unfortunately, it's not one that can be used in the article, but it does at least give a date for the accusations: [1]. Around the 2 May2005: happy hunting people. Driller thriller19:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To this AOL person who keeps inserting the Charing Cross hospital stuff: if you want to say this, you need to provide a source. Read through the NPOV stuff about how Wikipedia approaches these kinds of things.
I have just modified one external link on Greg Hands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
A quick Google doesn't throw up any sources mentioning this - it's perfectly possible that he was there and it wasn't mentioned in these sources (or that he is exaggerating!). Bellowhead678 (talk) 18:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
