Contents

Talk:HMS Sir Galahad

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Sir Galahad article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Maritime / British / European SIA‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles SIA This article has been rated as SIA-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force

Colledge doesn't mention a WWII-era minesweeper, what's the evidence for it? Stan 17:22, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)

The Navy News, the "online news of the Royal Navy," at http://www.navynews.co.uk/ships/sirgalahad.asp , states "[t]he original Sir Galahad was an Admiralty minesweeper trawler of the Round Table class." Not much, but it does indicate that it existed. --the Epopt 01:38, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Mysterious. I only have the first volume, not the one with the auxiliaries, but there are a number of other "Sir" minesweepers listed. Wouldn't be the first mistake I've turned up in Colledge tho, DANFS it ain't. Stan 05:46, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)