This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Ok, but the New York article has an entirely separate Cityscape section. I am not so comfortable if Parks itself is a Level 2 header. Though Parks could fit under a Tourism and Sights section and belong to Environment; Environment, of course, should come right after geography/climate either as a Level 2 or 3. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record15:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
True. NYC does deserve a cityscape section. Haikou is too small for that. Your parks and other suggestions are good. I would suggest that we nix the international relations section and bump up the sister city section. If you would like to suggest a layout here: User:Anna_Frodesiak/Silver_sandbox, I would be delighted to help design it. All are welcome of course. The London and NYC models are inspiring me to create new sections in this article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Could someone please check the colours on the map of districts? I may be getting the red and blue mixed up due to the pop. density figures: Longhua District = 2,156
I have just modified 3 external links on Haikou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.