Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 :(  
3 comments  




2 GA Review  
12 comments  




3 Reliability of Mambo Chita Tann's Book  
4 comments  




4 GA Review  
32 comments  













Talk:Haitian Vodou




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


:(

[edit]

Explain this better pls cause i was curious if voodoo dolls are real or do they work none of this explains it i dont wanna know when they were invented or stuff you lied about your thumbnail:( 2601:204:300:8940:BCAD:C9D2:FB2C:B6F3 (talk) 01:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Voodoo doll. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Vodou dolls are a symbol of health and care and not those clickabait videos where you can "curse" somebody. 45.58.90.197 (talk) 02:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Haitian Vodou/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vaticidalprophet (talk · contribs) 04:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been looking at this article for a while with an eye to reviewing it. I can't guarantee the most prompt review -- it's a long article (over 500 individual references!) and I'm finishing up another GAN at the moment -- but I didn't want to see it sit too much longer. It's excellent, fascinating work.

A couple of comments on the lead, pending a more comprehensive combthrough later:

  • I looked at changing default image size for "upright=200px" and then "upright=300px" but it does not seem to make any difference from the standard default size, at least in my browser, so I've left it as the former. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The upright parameter takes a scaling factor (like 1.2 or 1.35), rather than a an absolute size in px. The upright parameter is recommended as it gels well with accessibly software. Absolute sizes don't. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vaticidalprophet 04:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking this review on, Vaticidalprophet. No rush in getting it finished. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not reviewing this nomination, however I did give it a brief read, the only issue I see as far as I can tell is one of your references (Author: Cosentino), is not cited in the article making an error page pop up next to the bibiography portion.--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC) @Vaticidalprophet: Hoping that things are well with you. Did you have any further comments about this article at the present time? Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Argh -- sorry for not getting back to you. I've been very occupied offwiki for a few weeks, just when I was going to start looking seriously at this. It might be better to put this back in the queue, but I might be able to pick it back up at some point. Vaticidalprophet 20:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Vaticidalprophet: - Apologies for the delay in my response, I've not been active on Wikipedia lately either. If you feel that you cannot finish the review, that's no problem; could you ask for a "second opinion" review, perhaps? Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Midnightblueowl I would be interested in taking this over; however, it technically does not seem to be a "Second opinion" (which would still require the original reviewer to promote or fail), but rather an "abandoned review" (see WP:GAN/I#N4a)? Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jens Lallensack: It would be great if you could take it on. I think you're right about this being more of an "abandoned review" than a "second opinion", so I'll set it up accordingly. Looking forward to your comments, if you get the time! Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of Mambo Chita Tann's Book

[edit]

I wanted to raise concerns about this addition by an IP user, which I reverted as per WP:BRD, but which was then re-instated by User:Skyerise. The added sentence cites a book, Mambo Chita Tann's Haitian Vodou: An Introduction to Haiti's Indigenous Spiritual Tradition, that has been published by Llewellyn Worldwide, an esoteric/New Age publisher catering to a general audience. It is not published by an academic press, nor is it written by an academic. Given that we have a wealth of scholarly sources about Haitian Vodou available to us, I am not convinced that we need to use a Llewellyn book as a source, which, although not wholly unreliable, certainly wouldn't constitute the highest quality Reliable Source.

On a secondary level, the added sentence does not properly belong where it has been placed; it discusses the consumption of alcohol as a means of facilitating spirit possession, but has been sandwiched between existing sentences talking about offerings to the spirits, a slightly different topic. I would strongly recommend removing this addition and see no compelling reason for its retention. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Find the better source and move the fact somewhere it fits better. I'm sure it's both factual and citable though, so {{better source needed}} would be a better response then complete removal. Skyerise (talk) 10:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a fair enough, Skyerise. I'll have a dive into the academic literature and see if I can find a better source. Have a good week. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Keep up the good work! Skyerise (talk) 11:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Haitian Vodou/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 17:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 11:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


HiJens Lallensack. I don't want to rush you or put any pressure on you, but I just wanted to see how you were getting on with this? Did you have further comments? Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the delay. I get to it asap. Jens Lallensack (talk) 01:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've gone back and checked Brown, who states that "Haitian culture is a misogynistic culture. The ideology of male supremacy is fierce." She then goes on to give examples in Vodou of male priests mistreating female followers. Thinking it over, maybe it is best to just give that example in the Wikipedia article without summarising Brown's own commentary about Haiti as an intrinsically misogynistic society. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The cited source simply says that they can "range from a very small and humble shack to quite lavish establishments (the latter more often to be found in Port au Prince than in rural areas)." I therefore don't have any Reliable Sources that describe how big these temples can actually get, unfortunately. Perhaps I could reword the sentence in the article to "ounfòs vary in size and decor, with more lavish establishments being predominantly found in Port au Prince rather than in rural areas"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am unsure, to tell the truth. The process of proceeding through the additional stages is generally kept secret by initiates and is not something discussed in the academic literature (or at least, any of that which I have read, which is quite a lot of it). I think it highly likely that special preparations of one kind or another are required for the additional stages through which a Vodouist might progress, but obviously this cannot be discussed in the Wikipedia article without support from high quality Reliable Sources. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This was a sentence fairly recently added to the article (after you started the GAN, I believe) but which I wanted to remove for two reasons. First, I thought the source didn't constitute a high quality reliable publication (it's published by a New Age and esoteric company, rather than a university or other scholarly press). Second, the sentence is about drinking alcohol to facilitate possession by the lwa, and is completely out of place stuck in the middle of a paragraph describing offerings of food to the lwa. However, a third editor stepped in and urged me to keep it until I could find a better source. If you think it appropriate, I will however remove the sentence altogether? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well spotted; I have corrected this. I think that any animal species might be used; Metraux (p. 303) refers to accounts of such a being entering a victim's house while in the form of an insect. The term lougawou seems to come from the French loups-garous (i.e. werewolf) but the actual figure in Haitian lore is not much like the French folkloric werewolf; it is much closer to certain entities found in Central African lore. I'm going to remove the link to werewolf from the article as I think that will just confuse people. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is just a result of the lack of clear, standard orthography when it comes to Haitian Kreyol. One source will use one set of spellings, another source will favour another. I'll go through the article and try to make sure these spellings are standardised throughout. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I really appreciate you taking the time to do this, Jens Lallensack, and don't worry about the fact that it took a while; life can easily get very busy and we are all volunteers here at Wikipedia. There are a few points where I could do with your responses to my comments, particularly with regard to whether to remove one sentence and amend another. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Excellent, thanks. The responses all make a lot of sense and I think that the current state of the article is optimal. Great work. Promoting now. Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Haitian_Vodou&oldid=1233716096"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Philosophy and religion good articles
GA-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in Philosophy and religion
GA-Class level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
GA-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
GA-Class African diaspora articles
Top-importance African diaspora articles
WikiProject African diaspora articles
GA-Class Haiti articles
Low-importance Haiti articles
WikiProject Haiti articles
GA-Class Religion articles
Top-importance Religion articles
Religion articles needing attention
WikiProject Religion articles
GA-Class Spirituality articles
Top-importance Spirituality articles
 



This page was last edited on 10 July 2024, at 14:36 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki