Contents

Talk:Hammer v. Dagenhart

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cleanup

[edit]

It is my opinion that this article has been "cleaned up". Anyone second, third? Jareha 12:44, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I second that - I just added a few more touches. -- BD2412 ^talk 13:17, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

I find the following paragraph unclear, enough so that I don't really know how it could be improved. Any suggestions? Jareha 17:34, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"It is purely of state authority and it violates the constitution in two ways. First, it transcends the authority delegated to Congress over commerce. Second, Congress exerts power as to purely local matter to which the federal authority does not extend."

"hello" I don't have any fingers to type with, can some one lend me theirs?

The reason that I added some additional information from the dissent regarding the long list of articles of commerce that had been banned by Congress is that I think that it gives a flavor of the kinds of distinctions that the Court was making at this time. Any thoughts?

Jvonkorff (talk) 23:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]