| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 13, 2013 and November 13, 2014. |
 | On 11 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be movedtoHans-Adam II. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Is a tradition that the king borned in Zurich, Swiss, like symbol of fraternité. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.46.178.178 (talk) 20:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is an interview of the prince by Peter RobinsonofUncommon Knowledge. Asteriks (talk) 23:45, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here it says the Prince's threatened to move abroad in 2003 if he didn't get more power. Bearing in mind the royal family's bank employs 1500 people, he was quite clearly using his financial clout to blackmail the electorate. At least according to the BBC. This should go in. Malick78 (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Aren't the BBC, being a pro-republican newspaper also biased. Is there any mention of this in a Liechtenstein newspapeer? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.135.40.47 (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think the photo should be replaced with a newer one. In this picture the 67 year old Prince looks almost younger than his son, Alois. --E4024 (talk) 11:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hans-Adam II, Prince of Liechtenstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It states Hans-Adam would be "reigning". But he gave all his power to his son Alois in 2004 but maintained Fürst and didn't abdicate. So yes, he's still monarch but he doesn't reign anymore. Since 2004 he's a titular Fürst. --212.186.7.98 (talk) 12:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Hans-Adam II, Prince of Liechtenstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Florestan, Prince of Monaco which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:17, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I hope I've cleared things up a bit, concerning who 'currently' has veto power. As regent, that would Alois. Of course Hans Adam II can easily dismiss his son as regent, resume his royal powers & duties. GoodDay (talk) 03:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was: no consensus. It's clear that an RFC is needed to settle the issue on when numbered royals/nobles may have their "of Y" qualifiers removed. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hans-Adam II, Prince of Liechtenstein → Hans-Adam II – This article is the primary topic, I see no need for the disambiguation in the title. Juan Carlos I, Felipe VI and Charles III are also examples. Elme12 (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
European monarchs whose rank is below that of king (e.g., grand dukes, electors, dukes, princes), should be at the location "{Monarch's first name and ordinal}, {Title} of {Country}". Examples: Maximilian I, Elector of Bavaria, Jean, Grand Duke of Luxembourg.See also Talk:Florestan, Prince of Monaco#Requested move 12 September 2020. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
the title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize. The article title Hans-Adam II satisfies this criterion, no differently from how Surtsicna's example of James Monroe satisfies this criterion. Adding more description to the title is unnecessary disambiguation (WP:PRECISION). There is no other topic named Hans-Adam II. In addition, Hans-Adam is not a name shared by any other monarchy. This is in contrast to the phenomenon of names being widely shared between countries, like John, Philip, Charles, William, etc., which make up the bulk of WP:NCROY cases for monarchs, and which are a central part of the justification for why a WP:NCROY guideline is needed in the first place. Lastly, nothing in this discussion is about anything "overriding" anything else; it's a normal application of criteria and guidelines, which in discussions require individualized consideration as always. Adumbrativus (talk) 04:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Exceptions to the precision criterion may sometimes result from the application of some other naming criteria, with NCROY given as an example. I'm actually not too fond of overprecise titles myself, but I see it as an issue that generally needs to be worked out at the global-consensus level rather than in individual RMs. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
(non-automated message) Greetings! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users following this article talk page! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here!Hurricane Andrew (444) 19:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
