This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
It is a good thing wikipedia articles are not reviews
I think the article should mention Klok is gay and that (and why) he's pretending to be heterosexual. Generally speaking, there's no need for articles about people to go into this. However, Klok has intentionally, flat-out been lying about his sexual preference in interviews and such. In the Netherlands he has openly admitted to lying about his preference for commercial/contractual reasons, but on for example the Howard Stern interview with him and Pamela Anderson, he just lies, lies, lies. For 40 minutes, Stern asks about if they kissed or made out, why Anderson and Klok didn't have sex yet, and he just lies, on and on. "The rumors of his supposed romance with Anderson made headlines in his native country, where it is common knowledge that he is gay. Klok later admitted in a "QVegas Magazine" interview that the rumors were a publicity ploy and that he had been in a relationship with partner Frank for 16 years."[1] --82.170.113.123 (talk) 03:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deserves to be done. a biography section shouldn't be some play-by-play-by-play of everywhere he's been, every place he's performed Metamorphosis, etc. etc. --Bddmagic (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, and that's why I moved it back to the version of the article as it was back in early May 2012, before a certain other editor got their hands on it. Unfortunately, there's another editor out there who thinks differently and reverted my edit back to the other poor-quality version as criticized above. So, the question is which version do people think is better, the 8 May 2012 version by "Gidz" or the play-by-play version started by "92.66.152.58" and perpetuated now by "Signalizing"? I know which I think is better, and that's why I moved it back to the "Gidz" version and added a few new bits to it. 2.31.5.175 (talk) 23:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My revision was in error, and I apologize to 2.31.5.175 for the mistake made. I didn't even realize I reverted until after he/she brought it to my attention on my talk page. Signalizing (talk) 15:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Hans Klok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
