Contents

Talk:Happy Ending (Schitt's Creek)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Happy Ending (Schitt's Creek) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Happy Ending (Schitt's Creek) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 10, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

A fact from Happy Ending (Schitt's Creek) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the series finale of Schitt's Creek was written in three hours by co-creator Daniel Levy? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Happy Ending (Schitt's Creek).

The result was: promotedbySL93 (talk) 21:32, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• ... that the series finale of Schitt's Creek was written in three hours by co-creator Daniel Levy?Source: [1]
  • ALT1:... that the series finale of Schitt's Creek features actual cast members crying on set? Source: [2]
  • ALT2:... that the "Viking pope" costume worn by Catherine O'Hara in the series finale of Schitt's Creek was designed by Ana Sorys, the show's wig technician who had to create a total of twenty-five wigs for the final season? Source: [3]

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/2005 Football League Two play-off Final

Improved to Good Article status by Some Dude From North Carolina (talk). Self-nominated at 19:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

• The article was promoted to GA on 10 March, long enough, neutral and referenced. Earwig picked up this website but it's probably them copying from the article. The hooks are interesting and referenced, but ALT0 seems to work better. Images used in the article are either free or fair use. QPQ done. Corachow (talk) 12:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]