This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
"Soon after Ravi Kondabolu had immigrated to the United States in 1978,[5] while in small town Louisiana he was approached by a local who asked, "Excuse me, sir, are you a Chinese?" "
What is the point of this? Seems oddly placed and unnecessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.146.65 (talk) 02:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I assess this as B class. I see no obvious problems concerning that criteria. Here are some suggestions before nominating it for GA.
Minor
The infobox image caption is redundant and obvious to a viewer, maybe could be the alt text instead: A better caption would be saying the date and location (if possible). Maybe, "Kondabolu in 20xx during an interview by xx or during the xx show". MOS:CAPTION.
The numerous places where he interned, are any of them linkable?
whats " in-class sketches, "? Did he write them during a class?
Major
When I ask for relevance, by no mean does it imply it has to be removed. There could be some connection which is missing which would make it relevant or just my lack of knowledge.
"he was approached by a person who asked,..." what is the relevance of this quote? Seems trivial and remember that quotes should be used sparingly, especially when they can be paraphrased.
Same for all the details about his grandfather and father. Did they affect him? "Freedom fighter" is a word to watch; use "Independence activist".
"they are unusual:" The following quote doesn't make this any clearer as to how. Also, SUBJECTIVE attributes cannot be stated in the 'Pedia voice.
More possible overuse of quotes or unnecessary quotation marks: " The Bowdoin Orient reported:", "to pursue a career in which he would..", "project focusing on immigration and human rights, saying, "", "His act included...",
His initial standup career is unclear: From "He began writing...", "Kondabolu continued performing standup..." (no mentioned where), " Kondabolu had no intention.." (contradicts previous) and finally "Although his stand-up comedy career was gaining traction in 2007..." (how, what were those major breakthroughs?)
BLP sourcing issues on "Practicing Hindu" and the category male feminists. For beliefs and religions, sources mentioning the subject unambiguously stating so are required. Per the given source, he goes on and explains about his belief; after reading it, in my view, it isn't that straightforward to just refer to him so. Perhaps a quote could be added to it to elaborate. As to the feminist category, see WP:BLPCAT as the article doesn't mention it.
@Sumanah: regarding this edit, I don't think it's quite appropriate to refer to Kondabolu as a "public intellectual". I'm not terribly familiar with all of his work and his trajectory to this point, so maybe there's another side to him I'm not aware of, but from everything I’ve seen, I think it's more of a joke of his to refer to himself that way, and not a serious description. However, if I'm wrong about that, at the very least, we would need some reliable sources to back up that claim, and as nothing in the article seems to back that claim up right now, it shouldn't be in the lead. -- Irn (talk) 18:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Irn: What you've said makes a lot of sense and I appreciate your thoughtfulness. I see that the "public intellectual" description isn't in the lead any longer due to the most recent edit, and I understand that for a descriptor like that to be in the lead it really ought to be in the main body of the article as well, supported by citations from reliable sources. I'll be more careful in the future -- I've taken a fair amount of care with the rest of my contributions to this article and I'll aim to stay close to that standard. Best wishes! Sumana Harihareswara16:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Hari Kondabolu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
I can confirm that (regarding licensing) -- but a more recent photo of Kondabolu performing might be more ideal for this article. I've uploaded a few photos that people could crop and improve, in case one of them would be more suitable for this page; see right.
I've removed the following from External links, per WP:ELNO: they might have use as article development, but are otherwise extraneous news coverage. Wikipedia shouldn't strive to be a repository of links. --Animalparty! (talk) 05:40, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]