This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Saraswati has nothing in common with Hariti !
what is the source of this ?? Also Buddhism and Zoroastrianism . Are the author/authors not aware Hinduism has little in common with Zoroastrianism
The religion of Indus Valley was Vedic which is at best proto Hinduism . But Saraswati is a predominant hindu Deity. Zoroastrianism is a Vedic religion but has nothing in common with Hinduism . The essence is same but deities are different .
Buddhism is Hindu philosophy copy-pasted minus the Gods with Budha . I really dont know how authored linked Buddhism to Zoroastrianism.
Zoroastrianism/Hinduism are offshoots of Proto-Vedic Religion but Budhism is a direct descendant of Hinduism .
The Original Script of Buddhism is Parakrit and Ardhmaghadi Not Sanskrit . Later Scholars translated it to Sanskrit .
Kishimojin → Hariti … Rationale: In general, articles about Buddhist deities are given Sanskrit titles as representing the most universally recognized names - in this case "Hariti". The Kishimojin title suggests a purely Japanese deity, although the article is about a deity worshipped all across Asia under different names. The article cannot be moved to Hariti because it has already been moved from Hariti. … Please share your opinion atTalk:KishimojinRandomCritic17:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
Oppose. I suggest creating a separate article for Hariti, and keeping this one to focus on the purely Japanese side of the mythos. ···日本穣? · TalktoNihonjoe 03:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Support. After further consideration, I think it woul dbe best to move the article. ···日本穣? · TalktoNihonjoe22:44, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is the bastard offspring of Hārītī and Kishimojin.
It began life as a Japanese article, got renamed to Sanskrit, and now has a hodgepodge of terminology from both traditions.
Interestingly, the last family funeral I attended was conducted in Japanese and Sanskrit.
Someone should disentangle this article, clarifying what is universal, and is specific to either tradition. Varlaam (talk) 00:22, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sankrit is a classical language mainly used for religion/literature text. Budha never taught/preached in Sanskrit. Buddhist texts were later translated to Sanskrit. Budha spoke in Armaghadi/Parakrit.
The Sankrit influence arrives much later, with Buddhism turning into an organized religion.