 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Wikipedia is open to everyone on the Internet to place details and information and is not a place to arrange details on subjects to suit private views, in effect arranging the world to suit. The deletion of the details concerning the album release by The Zarjaz containing music by Biber is wrong and against Wikipedia principles. The release is a valid release containing music by Biber and so should be included in any discography despite any personal differences against this release. The release is made on a valid long standing label, by long standing and respected musicians and is available throughout the world. Further, where the Biber page notes references to Biber music in modern terms it is also important to note the significance of Biber being accepted and played by modern audiences as this is a credit to the composer and his music. Harleancarpenter (talk) 12:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to find some comment on the famous Sonata Batallia, with an astonishing bitonalism in the beggining. Thanks. --Leonardo T. de Oliveira 14:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Several sources, including academic ones apparently, give 1701. Whence 1697? Schissel | Sound the Note! 13:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC) (e.g.: Karl Heinrich Wörner, Wolfgang Gratzer, Lenz Meierott (1993): Geschichte der Musik: ein Studien- und NachschlagebuchatGoogle Books, p. 229. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, ISBN 352527811X.)[reply]
I can't find the sonata which has the same theme as Paganini's 24 Caprice. Can anyone help me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.199.66.195 (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the article "partita" (in the text) and "partia" (in the list of works) are used. I think only "partia" is correct. Can anybody help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.227.184.29 (talk) 15:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The list of compositions on this page is quite long and unwealdy, is it general practise on wikipedia to create a list or a catagory... i.e. List of compositions by Heinrich Ignaz Franz Biber (as I have recently done for Johann David Heinichen)? Davemnt (talk) 22:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The plaque does not mark Biber's grave, the location of which is unknown. It is just a general memorial in the cemetery of St. Peter's where Biber was buried.--Suessmayr~enwiki (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Heinrich Ignaz Franz Biber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
