Contents

Talk:High king

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Noldor#High Kings|high kings]] The anchor (#High Kings) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Isaiah Henry.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

High king → High King – Title. Per WP:CONSISTENCY with King of Kings, etc. Chicbyaccident (talk) 23:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - If anything, it is King of Kings that needs moving per MOS:JOBTITLES. Primergrey (talk) 15:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. This isn't a job title, it's a style of address. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The same as "king", "queen", "lord", "madam", etc. Unless part of a specific title, all these forms of address are lower-case. Primergrey (talk) 21:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per the argument of Randy Kryn. Dimadick (talk) 13:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – I don't understand the support argument. Since when do we cap "a style of address"? Dicklyon (talk) 04:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. The current title is the correct one. It's the other article that should be moved. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.