This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Duquesne University/UCOR 143 Global and Cultural Perspectives (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Regarding the Christianity section of this page[edit]
The Christianity section is highly negative, extremely biased, opinionated and certainly not a Neutral accepted point of view. Sorry to be honest, but this section is a cherry-picked rubbish of negative statements. It is a mockery of a so called 'Neutral' Encyclopedia.
106.217.76.155 (talk) 07:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article section conveys only 1 thing. 'Christians are evil monsters to the Hindus'. Honestly that is the text summarization of that section. Shame on Wikipedia for allowing such biased statements to be written. 106.217.108.130 (talk) 07:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The section is another classic example of Wikipedia being a propaganda tool. Along with many other websites, Wikipedia is also a place for promoting religious animosity. The article writeup proves it. 106.217.108.187 (talk) 08:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am just wondering how stupid can writeups even be in an Encyclopedia that screams for Neutrality but isn't by miles?
The Christian percentage in India is just 2% and it has been that for decades. I have not heard of Christians in India causing any trouble to the other communities around them. Christians are among the most peaceful and educated communities in India. How can such ridiculous propaganda be present in Wikipedia, especially in this article?
In Europe, the Americas and Oceania, the Christian majority countries are among the most peaceful in the world. Clearly many Wikipedia articles are propaganda and highly biased. 106.208.185.150 (talk) 09:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Heavily biased airtcle needs some improvement[edit]
I think the airtcle only needs to cover out some similarities and differences between christianity and Hinduism this airtcle downrights call christianity a barbaric religion which goes against our neutrality policies christianity is a religion with billions of followers worldwide many people searching though google are clicking on this what will chirstians thinks after seeing the christianity section? 950CMR (talk) 20:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We Only need to add similarities and differences between christianity and Hinduism with a unbiased view is that hard or easy? 950CMR (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do not add "legally unrecognised" cults as separate religion[edit]
See Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Ay. I have called for "India Project" expert's attention against attempt to legitimise (through insertion in wikipedia) a legally unrecognised sect Ayyavazhi as a separate religion which is still legally classified as subsect of Hinduism. Per wiki rules, legally FALSE text claiming Ayyavazhi as separate religion, even if based on reliable/reputed sources, must be rejected. 58.182.176.169 (talk)
