 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this versionofMesopotamian campaign was copied or moved into History of Kuwait with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Because of the inflamatory nature of the above comment in present circumstances, it needs to be accompanied by credible sources. What officials said this? Eclecticology 07:56 Feb 3, 2003 (UTC)
And when?Vera Cruz
Theres a lot to be said about this article. Namely, the disorganization of references. They do exist, however they are spread out and several pieces of information cannot be verified. Furthermore, poor grammar is quite common in a few areas. -Zer0fighta 01:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What's this "watheeka magazine (third edition) second year, July 1983, p14" ? What's the article title ? By whom ? Who publishes it ? Any web link to it ? If unanswered soon, this will have to go, and what it supports will have to be tagged "reference needed". --Jerome Potts (talk) 08:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC
What's this "watheeka magazine (third edition) second year, July 1983, p14" ? What's the article title ? By whom ? Who publishes it ? Any web link to it ? If unanswered soon, this will have to go, and what it supports will have to be tagged "reference needed". --Jerome Potts (talk) 08:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC
There is a large gap in this article regarding Kuwait's history from independence in 1961 until the Iraqi occupation in 1990. This is considered the most period of Kuwait's history and should not be neglected.
I have tried to clean up the article but am sure there exists more things to be cleaned. Shriram (talk) 09:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The reference doesn't substantiate the claims, it's doesn't confirm the claims being made. The reference is useless. Incorectforma (talk • contribs) 11:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In the "Founding of modern Kuwait" section, there's an entire paragraph dedicated to the Bani Utbah's sedentarization. That's unnecessary because the Bani Utbah aren't among Kuwait's earliest inhabitants (Bani Khalid and Huwala are). The Bani Ubah's pattern of sedenterization isn't relevant to the history of Kuwait. It's undue weight, Kuwait existed before the Bani Utbah (since Kuwait was a fishing village part of the Bani Khalid Emirate). Historical sources attest that Kuwait's earliest inhabitants are the Bani Khalid and Huwala. There's a lot of historical revisionism when it comes to Kuwait, undue weight given to a certain group is a violation of Wikipedia rules. The format of the citation appears as a PDF download on my computer. Incorectforma (talk) 11:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on History of Kuwait. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on History of Kuwait. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on History of Kuwait. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I will be changing the dating system on this article away from the biased, Christian based AD/BC to the common era system. This will bring the article into alignment with secular usage such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_India. If you object, please state why you are ok with the biased system here. Eupnevma (talk) 20:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
