This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The history of the 1960's and 1970's is strangely silent on the role of the British patron in the country. All the officers of the Omani army at that time were British, the SAS trained the Omani army and indeed carried out most of the fight in the fight against the Dhofari rebels, etc. This should be mentioned!!!70.23.207.197 (talk) 19:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing here for pre-Islamic Oman. I know only that Sumerian pottery was traded here earlier than 3000BCE. Can someone help out with a stub? Ian Page 10:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I will help u. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.85.109 (talk) 00:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
at the first line you can see that Oman was a bart of ...Achaemenid (6th to 4th century BC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_oman
but if you go to the history of Achaemenid there is no Oman but there is some other Arab country !! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achaemenid
then from the 3rd century BC to the arrival of Islam in the 7th century AD Oman was controlled by two other Iranian dynasties, the Parthians and the Sassanids http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_oman
but if you go to the history of Parthian Empire you can see the map and the TXT that there is no Oman also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parthian_Empire
and if you go to the history of Sassanids the Empire started from 224 to 651 AD 1-first thing that where was Oman ......before and after that date 2- the Arabic wiki and the English wiki is not the same for the Sassanids Empire (the maps are not the same).
look at the maps this is the English http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sassanids and this is the Arabic http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/ساسانيون
if you go to the history of Oman in Arabic Wiki... it's a big different...!
any way Oman was part of Eran for some time and they where kicked from Oman and also there where many old omani ruler and Kings that they didn't talk about in the English Wik
bye~Hotsalah
The early history section is superficial and only supported by secondary literature. It is laconic to the extent, that one can hardly make an error. Also, it is 'protected' so that one cannot edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.132.119.141 (talk) 17:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bhistoryofnations\.net\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I was browsing around the history of the gulf states (I was born and raised in the gulf...) and encountered this image on wikipedia itself and it says "A maximalist view of the "Empire of Oman" in the early 19th century; in fact effective control in Africa remained concentrated in coastal cities and their immediate surroundings." < Is that an exaggerated mapping then? To my understanding there was a short-lived Omani occupation of Mogadishu for example but I've never heard of the Omani influence being farther North. Certainly not in Northeast Somalia, I've never encountered records that would suggest such a rule. The page Awale-Abdi (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on History of Oman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]