 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asummary of this article appears in History of the United States. |
 |
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
 | On 16 June 2024, it was proposed that this article be movedtoHistory of the United States from 1964 to 1980. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Shouldn't the phrase about Carter being the first elected president from the deep south since the civil war untrue? Andrew Jackson is technically from the Carolina's. And one could make a case that culturally and politcally, Texas was comparible to the deep south states during the era that LBJ and Eisenhower were elected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.141.253.50 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]
Good work, Mav. Sorry that I'm a little distracted now with other projects. Just don't get carried away, esp. with the original content. 172 00:04 27 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Mav's edits were by and large excellent. However, I’ve corrected a few problems.
1.) Removed reference to Carter's defeat. The subsequent article deals with the election of 1980. 2.) I partially restored much of the content on 1968, which was the only section in the series really dealing with the baby boomers, the counterculture, the New Left, the assassinations of MLK and RFK, etc. 3.) Restored a couple of headings. Thanks to Mav for getting this article in shape. 172 02:54 28 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Actually, there have been some studies that show that most anti-Vietnam War people were not students but from the working class, and more "educated" people, as a whole, tended more to support the war, since it was tied up with their own economic interests. Danny
I don't think we can make a case for fair use for the Pulitzer Prize winning photo by Nick Ut with AP of Kim Phuc running from bombs. Ut's life was on the line and AP paid to have him there. They are entitled to whatever royalties they can get unless they have released the photo to the public domain. Further, [1] says VNAF did the bombing, not the U.S. -- ke4roh 17:46, Jul 13, 2004 (UTC)
Note that the image was deleted after full and detailed discussion on VfD. It must stay removed and should not be replace. --[[User:VampWillow|VampWillow]] 10:17, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
172 removed the above comment earlier. This is contrary to WP policy. --[[User:VampWillow|VampWillow]] 14:34, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Is there any room for the Burst of Joy picture on this page? I think it's rather pertinent. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 17:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article states that Robert F. Kennedy joined the presidential election campaign in 1968 as president Johnson pulled out of the race. However, in artcles on Robert F. Kennedy and United States presidential election, 1968 it is stated that Kennedy entered the race on March 16, and that Johnson announced his departure from the race on March 30. The same chronology is presented in the article about Lyndon B. Johnson. I have therefore marked the sentence in this article with the {{fact}} tag. --Astor Piazzolla 16:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why there's nothing about American participation in the Space Race? It was clearly one of most important events in the 60s! It's impact on science, medicine, telecommunications, mass media and popular culture is evident. Please correct it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.31.66.14 (talk) 17:51, August 25, 2007 (UTC)
Yes, the space race and feminist movement (the second wave) both deserve their own sections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawk08210 (talk • contribs) 00:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on History of the United States (1964–80). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of the United States (1964–80). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:History of the United States (1776–89) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:59, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:History of the United States (1776–1789) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
