Contents

Talk:Holiday

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Holidays Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Travel and Tourism: Vacations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Vacations. Folklore Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

2012 2013 2016 2019

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Additionally, this Wikipedia entry is not the place to denigrate American department stores, specifically; the way this was done in the cited source (if what seems to be a Wikipedia editor's rephrasing of this source is any indication) was highly theoretical, emotional, vague, and practically meaningless. Its poor quality aside, that content is not 'on topic' enough to warrant inclusion in this entry.

If you insist on leaving this section in the otherwise encyclopedic entry, we're going to have to expand its scope beyond just the United States. SteGenevieve (talk) 02:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you are apparently aware that merchants outside the U.S. also "commercialise" holidays, can you provide a source? HiLo48 (talk) 02:37, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]