This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Homosexuality in China article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Keithh5678.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 22:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JTorre23.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 22:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dannnleee.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 23:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Homosexual practices were tolerated in Tibetan monasteries as long as they were limited to the thighs and did not involve anal penetration.
http://www.case.edu/affil/tibet/tibetanMonks/documents/Tibetan_Buddhism_and_Mass_Monasticism.pdf
http://faculty.washington.edu/stevehar/Drepung.pdf
https://tibetanhistory-20thcentury.wikischolars.columbia.edu/The+Struggle+for+Modern+Tibet
http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i7538.html
http://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/files/2014/07/Stoltz-Tibetan-Polyandry-final1.pdf
http://www.iep.utm.edu/santideva/
https://collab.itc.virginia.edu/wiki/tibettourism/Gay%20%26%20Lesbian%20Travelers.html
Rajmaan (talk) 22:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all, I added a quick paragraph about the effects of Western gay and lesbian culture on the Chinese scene within the "Gay, lesbian, and queer culture in contemporary Mainland China" section. Somewhat undecided about whether or not it is okay to simply refer to the general culture as "gay" culture, or if it is more correct and inclusive to continue referring to it as the "lesbian and gay" culture. I stuck with the latter to stay safe. Patriqueliu (talk) 21:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Obvious consensus against. (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Homosexuality in China → LGBT+ Identity in China – The term h*mosexual is considered a slur by many gay and lesbian people, and it is inappropriate to continue referring to them as such when this article is meant to provide clarity into their history. Furthermore, this article mentions many subjects that fall under the rest of the LGBT+ umbrella, such as transgender identity. Therefore, the name should be changed to LGBT+ Identity in China as that would provide a more concise and accurate title which would not offend LGBT+ people. Faunadolls (talk) 01:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Homosexuality in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Homosexuality in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the following information in the Taipei Times and I think it might be relevant on this page:
At a news conference, Zang Tiewei (臧鐵偉), spokesman for the Chinese National People’s Congress’ legal affairs commission, emphatically declared that Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “lawmakers” would continue to limit marriage to men and women, noting that “this rule suits our country’s national condition and historical and cultural traditions.” [1]
Geographyinitiative (talk) 05:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In the short description of this article, it states that "the Communist Party of China criticized [Sina Weibo] for banning homosexual content." However, the article linked to it mentioned nothing about the Communist Party and instead only talked about public backlash. Should this part of the short description be altered in light of this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MangaMaster21 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The citation indicated (Hinsch 1990 p. 70–71) does not include this information. I have looked at the index and checked every indication in this source for information about Christianity and Islam and the author does not make any statements that would support the quoted claim. There does not seem to be any evidence that the above claim represents a historical consensus or even a significant view among historians. In addition, given that Christian and Muslim communities during the Tang period were quite small in number and had their influence on Chinese culture during this period was moderate, the claim appears quite dubious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.79.195.206 (talk) 19:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 16 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Clementineshou (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Clementineshou (talk) 19:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]