This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:Banner/ Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
Hong Kong Australians is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:Banner/ AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:Banner/ Hong KongHong Kong articles
Why Hong Kong gets a separate article? Why not Macau, why not Taiwan? OK Taiwan is not part of PRC but Han immigrant/descendant people from Taiwan are still chinese! (going by the same categorization that makes Malaysian chinese diaspora "Chinese")
Raising Hong Kong as separate article for Australia just opens a whole can of worms.
Please give adequate justification or I will nominate for deletion Oodas Squyeemo (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Hong Kong Australians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
Cantonese is the mother language of the majority of youngsters in Hong Kong. Replacement of Cantonese by the PRC government is done in the mainland only, apparently.--AlvinzTalk 13:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve removed the neologism tag: It's been here for ten years, but I can’t really see why: we have articles on numerous other Australian ethnic minorities (viz: here, and here) and Hong Kong was a legitimate separate place of origin for about a hundred years (probably still is, despite the hand-over). So I have deleted it. The original research tag is still there, though; there’s little in the way of reliable sources to back up the content. I trust everyone is OK with that. Moonraker12 (talk) 00:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]