This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject American Football League, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.American Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject American Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject American Football LeagueAmerican Football League articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Both '78 and '79, Oilers as wildcard team make it to AFC championship[edit]
This was part of the then new expanded format in which there was wildcard weekend and the two wildcard winners played each other. In both years, the Oilers won this game, won the divisional playoff the following weekend, and made it to the AFC championship, losing to the Steelers both years.
Now, in 1980 wildcard team the Oakland Raiders won the championship, winning Superbowl XV. But in the early 1980s, how many other teams did that or even made it to the AFC or NFC championships. And was there even one other team who went deep into the playoffs two years in a row, both years as a wildcard team? FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2012 (UTC)ok[reply]
Since the "history" of the Oilers and the "history" of the Titans are actually the uninterrupted history of a single club, it makes sense to include them together in one article. Referring to the "History of the Oilers" seems like a roundabout way of wishing/pretending the team didn't rebrand itself as the Titans. --68.179.186.240 (talk) 06:07, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't it make more sense to just call this article "Houston Oilers" instead of having that title redirect to this one? - dcljr (talk) 21:23, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Even though the infobox contains all of that info except players… - dcljr (talk) 04:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#Purpose of an infobox - "the purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article" (emphasis added). In other words, content in the infobox does not count in this regard. Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My point is that this article could be extended beyond just history and moved to the other title. I'm not going to do that, however, so I suppose the point is moot. - dcljr (talk) 02:31, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An RfC relating to relocated teams' article titles using "History of" has been opened and may be of interest to editors of this article. The RfC will add language to the WP:GUIDELINE and will affect this article's title and multiple others. Please join the discussion at the above link. Rgrds. --Bison X (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
