 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The paragraph relating to the 1987 restructure is not entirely accurate, in the sense that it does not give a complete picture. The explanation is necessary because Hoyts Cinemas, one of the three identities to come out of the restructure, was not listed until 1996. Errol Vieth 00:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that the Ace Cinemas link has been removed because it now redirects to The Movie Masters Cinema Group, a link for which can be found in this article. It is pointless having both links in the same article.--Klltr (talk) 08:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The locations section needs updating, due to the recent aquisitions of AMC and Berley Cinemas. --Klltr (talk) 05:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Something feels a little off about this article to me. It only seems to outline positive things about the company, but never negative things. For example, a recent edit I made was deleted. This means hat the article could be biased, and that needs fixing. --Klltr (talk) 03:34, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hoyts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I know, Wikipedia doesn't require that a company name be capitalised in its entirety (i.e. 'HOYTS') in articles merely because the company has chosen to do this in its own marketing and branding. Recent news articles in Australia still refer to the company with an initial capital only (i.e. 'Hoyts'). See, for instance, The Financial Review, The Advertiser, and The Sydney Morning Herald. I'd argue that we should continue to do likewise, despite recent edits to the contrary. Thanks. Meticulo (talk) 09:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible that Hoyts is named after American actor John Hoyt? Should it be included in the article? Thomas Norren (talk) 22:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
