 | Hurricane Igor has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | ||||||||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have been corresponding with Environment Canada, which is going to allow me to post their rainfall graphic for Newfoundland online with no changes (meaning it will be millimeters). That way, there will be no need to personally produce such a graphic. For storms which have only impacted Canada, I have agreed to produce both millimeter and inch graphics...for Igor I will only produce the inch graphics. I will leave it to you all to decide which should be used with this article, since both will be available. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why on the 2010 Atlantic Hurricane Season it says that Igor was a category 5, but here it's only at category 4? Zbase4 (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Someone got trigger happy and decided to put up Igor as a Category 5 when it was really a Category 4. That being said, it is very possible Igor will be upgraded to a Category 5 hurricane post season, given the TAFB, ADT, and SAB all at one point had a 7.0 Average.. or 140 knots. EndeavourLaunch (talk) 6:45, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
This source lists a bunch of news articles for information in Newfoundland related to Igor. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Don't you think Igor might be in the running for retirement due to damage in Newfoundland?
Well, now Igor was retired. Now it will stay without the 2010.72.184.184.55 (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
|
|
| Reviewing |
|
|
Reviewer: Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I have been reviewing this article for the past several days, and honestly, I think that this article meets the GA criteria right now. Very nice job!
The first sentence of the article seems to be contradicted by the Wikipedia entry for the Newfoundland Hurricane of 1775 which reportedly killed over 4000 people. --DougieOcean (talk) 23:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I saw this article at FAC but I was too busy at the time to comment. Anyways, my biggest concern here is units -- since it is an article that deals mostly with Canada (that is, it should, as Newfoundland was affected the most, by far), it should be metricated (rain in mm, distances and speed in km and km/h respectively). Also, I think there's more that could be done for the parts related to Canada, as it was quite a serious storm in Newfoundland. There's more sources/info available now on the aftermath, at least in Canada. Maxim(talk) 15:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since Igor reached 135 knots according to the NHC report (http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL112010_Igor.pdf), shouldn't it be a category 5? Pierre cb (talk) 03:18, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Hurricane Igor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on Hurricane Igor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
