This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AstrologyWikipedia:WikiProject AstrologyTemplate:WikiProject Astrologyastrology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiki Loves Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women in Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Wiki Loves WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Loves WomenTemplate:WikiProject Wiki Loves WomenWiki Loves Women articles
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
I swapped it out for the corresponding svg image, File:Conic Sections.svg. The fonts are different, but otherwise it looks the same. I don't see the font change or anything else as a good reason to be using the png instead of the svg. So after this swap the deletion discussion should not affect this article. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Natemup (talk·contribs) insists on adding to this article a story about an unrelated event in Alexandria in which, according to a Christian propagandist, some Jews massacred some Christians, giving the Christians an excuse to expel the Jews, loot their property, and blame them for their own expulsion. Given that the Jews were uninvolved in Hypatia's teaching or murder, I fail to see the relevance of these events to the article on Hypatia, and Natemup's insertion of this episode gives the appearance to me of trying to find excuses to blame other people than the murderers for Hypatia's murder. But I'm past the limit for reverts to the article, and it appears from past behavior that if I did revert then Natemup would just continue to edit-war to push it in. So instead can we have some discussion on whether this is relevant, please? Per WP:BRD the article should be left in the pre-addition state while discussion goes on but I'm not going to be the one to put it into that state. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In my view, it seems at best tangential to the subject of Hypatia herself (WP:UNDUE), and loading up additional details that were third-hand stories when the ancient writers set them down seems like a poor way to do history. XOR'easter (talk) 21:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I can understand your point, but the entire story (expulsion and all) is being sourced from the ancient "Christian propagandist" in question. Why include only half of his story? It's all relevant to the controversy leading to Hypatia's murder. natemup (talk) 22:07, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
the statement on the live page says, "despite the historical fact that the library no longer existed during Hypatia's lifetime.[8]"
If you read the reference it dose not say that. It says, "she was the head of the Platonist school in Alexandria."
The reference does not say what the live page claims it says.
And the idea that the Library of Alexandria no longer existed in the the time of Hypatia is disputed by multiple sources. For example, in the transcript of the TED talk entitled "What really happened to the Library of Alexandria" Elizabeth Cox wrote, "by the end of the 5th century CE, the great library had vanished." This is after the time of Hypatia.
User:Ekrepali and a succession of anonymous IP editors insist on replacing "Egyptian" in the lead by "Greek", with sources various academic articles using that term. They have repeatedly made that change and have so far failed to discuss it at all. From all we actually know of Hypatia, she was clearly a person of unknown ethnicity, living in a place that is now Egypt, that was at the time part of the Greek cultural milieu. I imagine that this is what all reputable sources about her mean when calling her "Greek"; less-reputable sources don't give the matter any thought and assume without evidence that she was ethnically Greek. It is reasonable to guess that her ethnicity might have been Greek but we cannot rely on such guesswork here. I have the strong impression that the IP is pushing the ethnically-Greek angle; for instance, by linking the word "Greek" in their preferred version of the lead to an article on people of Greek ethnicity. Can we discuss here what our lead should say about her, and how to accurately and concisely convey that context, rather than (as the IP is doing) pushing a point of view based only on the prevalence of words in sources and not what those words actually mean, and trying to get the edit to stick through sheer stubbornness rather than consensus? I'm not convinced we need to state a nationality here at all, let alone an ethnicity. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"despite the historical fact that the library no longer existed during Hypatia's lifetime"?[edit]
The article states that "Since the late twentieth century, some portrayals have associated Hypatia's death with the destruction of the Library of Alexandria, despite the historical fact that the library no longer existed during Hypatia's lifetime."
It then links to a page of Jonathan Theodore's book, The Modern Cultural Myth of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, as a source. However, even in Theodore's own words: "There was no 'Great Library' in the sense of the iconic vast, priceless collection."
The articles current edit seems to imply that there was no Library of Alexandria at all existing during Hypatia's lifetime and that this is an established "fact". But that's not what the source is saying and there's currently no evidence to prove this either way. The source is saying that if the library did exist, then it likely didn't include as immense of a collection as many people presume it did. I.e., it could have existed, but if it did it wasn't "great".
While it's highly probable that the library was no longer in existence at this time, it certainly hasn't been found to be a fact that it didn't.
Even in Wikipedia's own article about the Library of Alexandria, it includes the possibility of the library still standing in 642 AD (227 years after Hypatia's death) in the section which reads: In 642 AD, Alexandria was captured by the Muslim armyofAmr ibn al-As. Several later Arabic sources describe the library's destruction by the order of Caliph Omar. Bar-Hebraeus, writing in the thirteenth century, quotes Omar as saying to Yaḥyā al-Naḥwī: "If those books are in agreement with the Quran, we have no need of them; and if these are opposed to the Quran, destroy them."
Again, it's unlikely that the library was still standing during this time (and the article correctly emphasizes the skepticism around the claim) but this does underscore that this is a disputed matter, regardless of how probable or improbable it may seem. TheGutterMonkey (talk) 09:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
David Eppstein you reverted my changes on adding a particular image of Hypatia. What do you think of Hypatia by Julius Kronberg, 1889.jpg? It is a depiction of her from a much more reliable artist. I understand, of course, that there are no surviving illustrations of Hypatia in her time, but I generally think a visual representation within a person's biography is beneficial. GuardianH (talk) 09:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is not. Sorry, but we've debated this a million times. There is no conceivable value at all in plastering articles with random imaginary images of people, when those images tell us exactly nothing about the subject of the article – the only thing they do is giving readers a fake sense of familiarity with the subject, which is illusionary and, as such, actually harmful. Fut.Perf.☼10:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's more than harmful, it's an embarrassment. It tells the readers "we care more about making our articles look decorative than being informative". See WP:PORTRAIT for more on why this kind of image should not be included. —David Eppstein (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps I am blind but I didn't see any list of original sources relating to Hypatia. Where are they? What are all the writers quoted in this article basing their opinions on? van Lustig (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In all fairness to the late Dr. Carl Sagan, he states in the last chapter ("Who speaks for Earth?") of his book Cosmos, "its last remnants were soon destroyed after Hyptia's death"; this indicates that Dr. Sagan was aware that the Library of Alexandria had largely ceased to exist in "any recognizable form" during the lifetime of Hyptia. Jehannette 04:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jehannette (talk • contribs)
level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
