This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Does someone have information regarding the history and development of the ICER codec? Who created it and at which organization/site?
--DBBell (talk) 22:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Basically all of the sources cited in the article seem to be self-published by JPL/NASA. Is the topic notable? — BarrelProof (talk) 00:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Over half of this article compares the ICER format to JPEG 2000. It sounds almost like a sales pitch, as in the section, "Design commonalities with the JPEG2000 compressor." There are already plenty of comparisons between the two formats on the JPEG 2000 page.
Could someone rewrite this article to focus more on ICER and less on this other format? --Charizardpal (talk) 04:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on ICER. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– No primary topic. The nonprofit Institute for Clinical and Economic Review gets more page views than the file format, and Google Scholar results return a wide variety of topics in which the file format does not prominently figure. ICER file format doesn't appear to be an expandable acronym. (t · c) buidhe 22:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The file format is certainly not a primary topic, since I can't find any mention of it with a web search for independent third-party sources. The only sources cited in the article are self-published by the institution that designed the format. There is also a highly respected annual scholarly conference and Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. — BarrelProof (talk) 04:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
