Contents

Talk:IMDb

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IMDb article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Websites: Computing Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance). Film This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles Television Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Libraries Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from hereorhere Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: "The 50 most-viewed Wikipedia articles in 2009 and 2008". The Daily Telegraph. August 17, 2009.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest and neutral point of view. Floatjon (talk · contribs) This user has not edited the article. This user has declared a connection. (Declaration)

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2008, 2009, and 2010.

Wondering if the word "abbreviation" (In the lead paragraph), should be substituted with the word acronym?JakeJakubowskitalk 01:37, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this would be a good idea, but would putting this as a "British-founded American" subsidiary of Amazon be a good idea? Also, would you say the place was founded in the English city of Bristol? I was just asking in case, seeing as it was founded in the UK and now owned by Amazon? MrDragonBoi (talk) 13:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, if Wikipedia is supposed to maintain even an iota of credibility, do your work people! IMDB is quite openly manipulating the displayed average rating of the newest Disney reboot disaster, calling it "weighed". IMDB has been known for being a target of review botting for a long time, but now the site itself (subsidiary of Amazon) has categorically lost all credibility by faking average ratings (which is the primary factor people are going to notice when looking up a movie to decide whether they should watch it or not). Don't let this happen to Wikipedia too by being oblivious of important developments in internet culture!

No clue why the update to my post didn't get posted, but just check the user ratings of Rings of Power, the Little Mermaid and Netflix's Queen Cleopatra (not weighed), and do the math and add it to the IMDB article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.170.86.132 (talk) 10:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a system that seems easy to exploit, I agree. If you wanted to add a sentence or two about this, it would be good if you provided some reliable sources, though. EditorInTheRye (talk) 11:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Internet Movie Databse has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 9 § Internet Movie Databse until a consensus is reached. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 18:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]