This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
It is clearly not promotional editing to talk about A) how they don't admit more than xyz percent of students and B) what their alumni do. These are rather standard to include, and are important measures. I completely disagree with the process of removing the entire section, rather than cleaning it up, so I reverted so that they could be cleaned up. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 20:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These were recent, explicitly promotional additions. You go to the talk page to discuss what can be salvaged from the COI additions after they have been dealt with. Not the reverse. The onus was actually on the original editor to make his case in the talk page from the beginning for these promo additions, then proceed. But that isn't what they did, so the WP:PROMOTION has been rightly removed, and now we can go over what can be added neutrally, just as it should have been from the start. GuardianH (talk) 20:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand where you're coming from, but prefer a method where the section is tagged as promotion, and then worked on. It's more challenging to go into the article history to salvage bits than it is to work in the moment. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 22:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SerAntoniDeMiloni, that may be challenging for you, but GuardianH and I were working on it already. Of the content you restored, half is gone, and that's actually something you could have done. If you were so concerned with valid, verified content, you could have been a lot more judicious in your revert. Drmies (talk) 00:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clocked that I reverted this quite close to it being removed. Didn’t spot that these edits were happening today - had assumed they were old reverts. My mistake… SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 02:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
