 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2011/March/Pages/NavyContractsSeenasVictoriesforAluminumShips.aspx The hulls share the same structural aluminum and geometry of extruded panels. They also run on the same model main propulsion diesel engines. Suppliers are providing the same aerodynamic fins, ride control components and software on both vessels. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems serves as the ship systems integrator on both programs.
I don't understand why the phrase "Agressive disintigration at the molecular level" is being used in the 'corrosion management' section of this article.
It basically looks like someone working for the contractor went into the article and re-wrote that whole section so that there is no reference to RUST.
58.165.97.44 (talk) 06:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The title of this article erroneously refers to the variants as classes in and of themselves. No official Navy source I can find does so, nor do the contractors working on the variants. Wikipedia appeared to have been incorrect in their nomenclature, so I started fixing it then got reverted for "nonsense". Here are my sources... http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=4200&tid=1650&ct=4, http://www.lmlcsteam.com, ... even the GD page which has "class" in the URL refers to it as "variant" throughout the actual text http://www.gdlcs.com/independence-class-lcs. I'd like to propose Wikipedia use the same terminology as everyone else and move this page to "Independence-variant Littoral Combat Ship". --Sam (talk) 15:04, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The link cruise ship is to an article on large passenger liners. Obviously, littoral combat ships are not the same. Terry Thorgaard (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Independence-class littoral combat ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Independence-class littoral combat ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Independence-class littoral combat ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Independence-class littoral combat ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
