Contents

Talk:Indium phosphide

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemicals: Core Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist.

Practical use[edit]

Could someone confirms that this higher velocity means Indium phosphide could help make faster computers? If that holds true, what would be the consequences on Moore’s Law?
David Latapie (✒ | @) 09:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article presents a formula and a graph for the index of refraction of InP; they are inconsistent. For example, the formula yields an "n" of 3.326 at 1 micron, whereas the graph (and its accompanying text) list about 3.47 at 1 micron.

Can someone tell which (if either) is correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.18.222.73 (talk) 18:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This part below is deleted from the article because

• it is inconsistent, as mentioned above (which inconsistency I confirm); the figure is a wrong reproduction of the empirical formula (i.e. fit of missing experimental data), for which no source is provided.
• it unbalances this article which desperately needs basic properties, not rare ones.

NIMSoffice (talk) 08:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Optical properties (removed from the article)[edit]

The Sellmeier equation that describes how the optical refractive index for indium phosphide depends on wavelength is given by ${\displaystyle n^{2}(\lambda )=7.255+{\frac {2.316\lambda ^{2}}{\lambda ^{2}-0.6263^{2}}}+{\frac {2.765\lambda ^{2}}{\lambda ^{2}-32.935^{2}}},}$ where λ is the wavelength in micrometres.

This gives refractive index values rising from around 3.21 at 10 µm and 3.32 at 1.5 µm to 3.47 at 1.0 µm.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Indium phosphide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061111080639/http://www.espimetals.com/msds's/indiumphosphide.pdftohttp://www.espimetals.com/msds's/indiumphosphide.pdf
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160601082034/http://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/InP/index.htmltohttp://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/InP/index.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070923081702/http://ieeexplore.ieee.org:80/xpl/RecentCon.jsp?puNumber=3525tohttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentCon.jsp?punumber=3525

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some citations to other websites in the section that need more citations. If you need anything or need to report anything go to ẞotstalks. Thanks people for responding so I could add more citations. EBotsEle^ẞotstalks 02:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]