Contents

Talk:Internet suite

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Need expansion[edit]

We should put more information about internet suite, e.g. its history, comparison with standalone apps, why it failed/successed, etc. --minghong 09:45, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Frighteningly, GNU Emacs does all of the things listed as being Internet-suite capabilities -- in many cases several times over. For example, it has two web browsers (W3 and Emacs-W3M), two IRC clients (irc and ERC), at least five mail user agents (rmail, VM, Gnus, Mew, Wunderlust), two of which also work as newsreaders, Ange-FTP for working with files over FTP, several different HTML-editing modes (a dedicated HTML mode, and psgml), BBDB for maintaining contact details, and even a Gopher client if you look hard enough.

Since many of these are separately maintained extensions, it's hard to pin them down to specific versions of Emacs. What's the best way of fitting Emacs into this list? (Also, how do we measure userbase size for something which is, allegedly, primarily a text editor?)

(This may seem frivolous, but I do seriously use Emacs for daily mail, news, RSS-feeds and IRC, and occasionally as a web browser. I doubt I'm alone.)

82.108.130.2 (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that an article about internet suites should explain what an internet suite is, a comparison page among different internet suites should be placed in another page or at least that part of the page should not be prominent the way it is today in the article itself. I suggest to split the article and to create a "Comparison of internet suites" page. Anyway I will remove the category "software comparison" because the page is not a software comparison page but it is about internet suites. --Jacobubus (talk) 19:06, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internet suite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061021053237/http://www.opera.com/pressreleases/en/2001/11/20011129.dmltohttp://www.opera.com/pressreleases/en/2001/11/20011129.dml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent info in this article seems to be from 2009, and since then Internet Suites don't seem to have continued in the form described by this article. Shuld it be rewritten from a historical perspective / merged with another article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BobEret (talk • contribs) 00:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find any info on current suites. Maybe they dont still exist, but I could be wrong. I will post any relevant sources here. Skullovitch (talk) 16:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]