![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No article should ever say "as of right now", it needs to read something like "as of March 2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.254.108.24 (talk) 13:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It has recently been announced that Everwood is going to be canceled over on the WB. I have been an avid fan of the show since the start 4 years ago. It is a family oriented show that has managed to be original while at the same time not compromising its morality. Please consider picking up this show before it is gone forever. I think you will be pleasantly surprised by the loyal fan following that the show will bring along with it. -- Everwood Fan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.195.3.97 (talk • contribs) 02:11, May 23, 2006.
These series are NOT mentioned in the press release. They are also animated. The word at sitcoms online is i has acquired 12 series at this time. 10 are mentioned in the press release. They are going to air from 6PM-11PM. None are animated series. Both Batman & Superman air currently on Boomerang (TV channel). --172.146.187.6 22:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bonanza and Gunsmoke are not Sony owned shows. They belong to Paramount and air on TV Land. I am removing this from the paragraph on Sony. Jude86 17:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that moving this page to I (Independent Television) (TV network) was completely unnecessary and uncalled for. Should we move this page to I (Independent Television) or back to I (TV network)? One thing's for sure, we CANNOT, under ANY circumstances, leave this page where it is. I'm sorry, but this is NOT a suitable title for an article. -- M (speak/spoken) 14:51, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The "Family" programing thing is over with right? 2 weeks ago this netowrk showed a blaxploitation double header consisting of Superfly and Shaft. Yes they were edited for broadcast, but they still ain't family freindly. And that Mytv stuff is filled with sex. Not that i mind, i love sex and violence, but the article wasn't very clear about the fate of the "family" thing. This is great though, i hate that family freindly bull ---- and i wanted this so-called"network" to fail and it has. ---- you paxton! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.205.186.164 (talk • contribs)
Is there a section in the article that indicates that ION took its focus away from the "family-friendly" shows? I could not find it, and I think considering that PAX started out as such a family/religious network, this shift is important to note. TomStike (talk) 20:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just created the List of programs broadcast by ION Television. Can you guys please help me with it? Thanks!Nickelodeonfan2007 02:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If ION is being sued because it copied off another company's name, then I've got a suggestion. The network name should change to Channel America. Two reasons;
Don't ask us, this isn't what the talk page is for. We'll just have to wait and see. -- M (speak/spoken) 16:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An anonnymus IP has recently change the primetime schedule table. As this IP was recently accused of vandalism, it may be possible that this information is incorrect. Is the schedule right? I have no access to ION so I can't check it by myself. Bolt 20:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw this on the program list under the "Future" section. I don't remember that show being part of the deal, but if so, that's a big development. (Or is it junk of the "Coming soon to ABC Family: Blossom" variety? WAVY 10 22:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking at one point didn't ION rank higher than MyNetworkTV I am not sure if they have ever ranked higher than The CW but I think at one point weren't they ahead of MyNetworkTV? ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 07:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Which recently got removed by Alucard 16 (talk · contribs). I was wondering why RHI and NFL Game of the Week weren't on there! Please, don't add it back in again without adding a source. -- M (speak/spoken) 00:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following excerpt contains poor grammar and I question its neutrality.
"The network's wholesome family-friendly format was lampooned by other television series such as The Simpsons, Will & Grace, and MADtv. These show in turn were about dysfunctional families, homosexuals and comedians trying to emulate the more aclaimed Saturday Night Live airing on NBC" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulfetishdeux (talk • contribs) 05:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I boldly removed the second sentence, per POV issues. 68.209.235.149 03:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ION in my area shows infomercials all day. 76.126.29.36 (talk) 23:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the corner of the screen on the ION network it reads: 'in X-amount of days, new look, new shows.' This will take place around Monday, Sept. 8. Is the network revamping, and if so, should it be mentioned here? 98.221.133.96 (talk) 02:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 18:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ION Television → Ion Television — Per WP:Trademarks:
* Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official": — Emarsee (Talk • Contribs) 17:36, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.I noticed that Ion Television has acquired the domain names iontelevision.com and ionlife.com from Positive Ions, the party that was suing them approximately a year ago. However, I haven't found any news to suggest they have actually settled.
Mdavsn (talk) 08:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The image Image:Ionlifelogo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You've got to be kidding me ... isn't anyone monitoring this article?
"In 2006, PAX, aka "i" engaged in "i" dentity theft" when Brandon Burgess, the new President, decided to change the name of the company to "ION Media Networks" and television channel to ION, knowingly ripping off the ION name brand and infringing on Positive Ions' intellectual property and its ION Network - which features over 1,500 ION Channels..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.177.184 (talk) 19:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ION has been on 181 it will be moved to 280 for Dish Network and for Direct TV will stay on 305. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.245.8.78 (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ion Media Networks would seem to be subsumed by this article. ENeville (talk) 05:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think the "Pax Kids" section should be split into an article entitled Pax Kids MeteorMan7228 19:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a short section on Ion's new AirBOX premium service. I figured, since they've updated the airbox.com domain and are selling AirBOX boxes now, that means that the service has officially launched. It still needs to be expanded, though. 64.107.114.99 (talk) 22:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Some user thinks Ion Television isn't originally called Pax when it first started and keeps removing that information from the article. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 20:06, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ion Television. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As of 2020 this is a proposed deal and Warren Buffett is named as one of the Investors backing the deal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C600:3C20:E98A:665F:EF71:8FF1 (talk) 15:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 15:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ion Television → Ion (TV network) – Shortened name used in promos; starting discussion per User:BilCat Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Since the logo changed to just "Ion", this wiki needs to change the title and beginning of the article. Bring home the edits (talk) 20:22, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]