Contents

Talk:Jaipur bombings

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jaipur bombings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 13, 2011, May 13, 2018, May 13, 2023, and May 13, 2024.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Low-importance). India: Rajasthan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan. This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps workgroup, to create and add a map to this article. Once the requested map is added, remove the map-needed parameter. An editor has requested that an imageorphotographbeadded to this article. Islam: Islam and Controversy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force. Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photographbeincluded in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Rajasthan may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Perhaps consider expanding the international reaction section a bit more. Gautam ^Discuss 06:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was the suspect released, or was the sketch to the public? Clarify. --66.160.82.118 (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canada's and Israel's reactions are almost identical, coincidence? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MikelZap (talk • contribs) 23:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definite move to 2008 Jaipur bombings. Whats with the date? No wikipedia article uses this format. --haha169 (talk) 01:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See 7 July 2005 London bombings, 29 October 2005 Delhi bombings, 11 July 2006 Mumbai train bombings, 11 March 2004 Madrid train bombings and of course, September 11, 2001 attacks. --AI009 (talk) 04:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.182.227.49 (talk) 22:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harikah (rendered Harikat as part of the genetive construct), although it can mean "action", is - in the context of a political, social or religious group or organisation - more correctly translated as "movement"; so a better translation would be "The Islamic Jihad Movement", or alternatively "The Movement of Islamic Jihad". Additionally, translating 'jihad' as 'holy war' etc. (although not done here) does not convey the full sense of the word - the word is in common enough usage in English to be rendered as 'jihad'. 81.110.190.8 (talk) 22:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More stuff needs to be written on Bangladesh's proxy war against India and why expelling these Bangladeshis from India is so important. They flood into India searching for jobs and when they see rich Indians, they become jealous and bomb Indians in the name of 'jihad'. India should nuke Bangladesh. --122.163.114.177 (talk) 04:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jaipur bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/FullcoverageStoryPage.aspx?id=ba873f80-b554-48c2-be89-3917c7e6f249TerrorstrikesJaipur_Special&&Headline=%27Unknown+terror+group+claims+responsibility%27
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080706082546/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hIA4Jrf22A_LF8AAsPgwjxgZviVwtohttp://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hIA4Jrf22A_LF8AAsPgwjxgZviVw

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]