Contents

Talk:Japanese eel

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fishes Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Vietnam This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Japan: Food and drink Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:13, June 21, 2024 (JST, Reiwa6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Food and drink task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: edit history watch purge Peer review: Kako River (Japan) A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles

It is requested that a photographbeincluded in this article to improve its quality. The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Is this also called "conger eel"? Badagnani 08:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No that is a completely different species found in India and the Pacific ocean. Irisbishins (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article stated that the spawning ground discovered by Japanese researchers in 2006 was the first ever discovered for an anguillid species - this seems incorrect, since the Sargasso Sea is such a spawning ground and has been know for almost a century. Is there a difference ? Or did the author mean that in this case the location was pinpointed more precisely ? In the meantime I removed the statement Nberger (talk)

The Sargasso Sea is a very general location and it has not been confirmed as the spawning ground for the Atlantic species of eel. The placement is based on speculation given small specimens that have been found in areas around it. The location found in the Pacific was far more precise and was confirmed by the discovery of 4 day old specimens, the youngest found of any species as far as I have ever heard. I look for a reference to that effect. Djlayton4 | talk | contribs 05:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

where does the year of the first description comes from? i found the year 1842. I think the first description was in "fauna japonica" (http://edb.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/exhibit-e/b02/image/01/b02s0265.html). other sources said 1846 (http://eol.org/pages/206835/names/synonymsorhttp://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=271705). what is correct? --217.76.99.221 (talk) 10:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It must be 1846, see: FishBase. --Ykvach (talk) 12:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick answer. I know this page. But what is with the other references i gave? Espacially with Fauna Japonica where these authors (Temminck and Schlegel) have described Anguilla japonica 5 years earlier. In my opinion, there is maybe a citation error because the Fauna Japonica consists of some more issues. Maybe Fishbase took the wrong one. My problem is, that the section about A. japonica in Fauna Japonica is not in my language so I can't check if that is a correct description of the species or only some thoughts about a new fish they find an described later. --217.76.99.221 (talk) 15:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably, it was described as nomen nudum in 1842. It must be studied. At this time, official year of the species description is 1846. --Ykvach (talk) 17:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 5 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Irisbishins (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ird003, Oaj002, Netasha8.

— Assignment last updated by Netasha8 (talk) 20:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]