Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 GA Review  
38 comments  


1.1  General comments  





1.2  Lead and infobox  





1.3  Early Life  





1.4  Flying training  





1.5  Record attempts for England to Australia  





1.6  New Zealand tour  





1.7  Return to England  





1.8  England to Brazil  





1.9  Interlude  





1.10  England to New Zealand  





1.11  Publicity tour  





1.12  Australia to England  





1.13  European tour  





1.14  Second World War  





1.15  Later life  





1.16  Return to public life  





1.17  Final years and death  





1.18  Legacy  
















Talk:Jean Batten/GA1




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

< Talk:Jean Batten

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Trainsandotherthings (talk · contribs) 00:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'll be reviewing this article. It's second in line after another GA review I'm doing, but I should have initial comments within 24 hours. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]


I was delayed longer than I would have liked by real life and GA backlog drive coordinator responsibilities, but I'm starting the review now. While the article appears very well written, it's fairly long so it may take me a while to have the review done.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    A few errors identified that need fixing. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    All fixed. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    Mostly good, a couple things identified in my comments need addressing. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Good to go now. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    References are all books, and presented in a proper style. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    Cited entirely to secondary sources (books). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    C. It contains no original research:
    Extensively cited. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
    No issues from an Earwig check. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    Very comprehensive coverage of the subject. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
    The article is certainly long, but it stays focused on Batten throughout. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
    Documents Batten's feats without becoming cheerleading, acknowledges her flaws as well, and gives everything fair weighting. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
    History since October shows copyedits and improvements, no issues here. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    I've verified all images are either public domain or have appropriate licenses. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Captions are appropriate for the images, and all images are relevant. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    On hold pending remaining comments being resolved. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    No further concerns. Article passes. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General comments

[edit]

Lead and infobox

[edit]
  • I wouldn't normally pick up one this long, but it's very well written (notice I'm almost entirely just nitpicking) and an interesting subject! I'm hoping to get through the rest of the article today, and once I do I'm almost certainly going to promote this to GA, and you could definitely consider pursuing FA afterwards if you so choose. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Early Life

[edit]

Flying training

[edit]

Record attempts for England to Australia

[edit]

New Zealand tour

[edit]

Return to England

[edit]

England to Brazil

[edit]

Interlude

[edit]

England to New Zealand

[edit]

Publicity tour

[edit]

Australia to England

[edit]

European tour

[edit]

Everything looks good to me in this section.

Second World War

[edit]

Later life

[edit]

Return to public life

[edit]

Final years and death

[edit]

Looks good to me.

Legacy

[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jean_Batten/GA1&oldid=1064173601"





This page was last edited on 7 January 2022, at 00:17 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki