| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Squire article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Stone Roses....renunion?
Please get back together
Nothing on Squire's guitar playing? Surely he can be considered one of Britain's greatest guitarists, no? While Second Coming may not have been the most accessible of albums, Squire's exceptional talent made many otherwise mediocre songs stand out.
I think Squire's page could do with some tidying up, especially fleshing the background segment.
I agree with you. there's nothing about squire's time at cosgrove-hall, for instance, or his cycling accident. the shane meadows fan-flick shows both john & ian holding babies from their first long-term relationships. I'm not going to dive in & fix this because my recollection only extends as far as the days following the 'paint-job' on silvertone's offices; I lost touch with them after that.
duncanrmi (talk) 03:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know who it is (obviously) who keeps removing my website links from the external links pages of every page relating to The Stone Roses but if you could stop it... then that'd be coool. ta.
TheJSU 16:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
and again today (06/09/07), can we please leave the links on the page, thank you. TheJSU - http://www.john-squire.com 08:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:ClassicJohnSquire.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Should this article not include under his artwork section at least a mention of his work on the British cartoon DangerMouse?
Alucardtepes (talk) 17:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He didn't work on Dangermouse, he is credited on The Wind in the Willows though - both Cosgrove Hall productions. He was a modeller, not an animator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.207.212.94 (talk) 12:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed this on john deacon and alan whites page as well. if you retire does that mean you wont be given a photo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.43.203.36 (talk) 19:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Squire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Squire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
like, i get the guy is kind of a recluse and there aren't that many photos of him, but this one sucks.
sometimes it's better to have no picture instead of one that looks like this.
he looks like a clammy, grimey dude.
contrast this picture to: this, thisorthis
i should try talking to the guy in the last photo because maybe he'll license it for wiki.
really this picture needs to go. it's offensive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.159.210.81 (talk) 02:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
He hates roses is seen by many as the reason for the name. 86.187.163.78 (talk) 15:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
