| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joint-stock company article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Akciová společnost page were merged into Joint-stock company. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (9 July 2017) |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
The German article de:Aktiengesellschaft is treated as a synonym/sibling article for Joint-stock company, not an independently notable concept. Existing content can be merged to the appropriate section of the Joint-stock company article and later split summary style as needed. czar 19:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BbbjHas three no votes as of April 2022, started in February 2021.! This is no. Telecine Guy (talk) 19:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article makes out that China and some European countries had joint stock companies in the medieval period. This misrepresents the nature and liabilities of a joint stock company. There are no specific distinctions made of this kind in the article. It simply states, 'The earliest records of joint-stock companies appear in China...' This renders the definition of the joint stock company meaningless. There is then some attempt to define joint ventures and joint ownership agreements in Europe in the thirteenth century which have nothing to do with enterprise trade, limited liability or operational autonomy. These simply are NOT joint stock companies. The first joint stock company was the Muscovy company in England. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.36.51.218 (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Voice 106.206.251.179 (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps I've misunderstood the concepts, but shouldn't the following sentence,
Without limited liability, a creditor would probably not allow any share to be sold to a buyer at least as creditworthy as the seller.
actually say,
Without limited liability, a creditor would probably not allow any share to be sold to a buyer unless the buyer is at least as creditworthy as the seller.
Tedd (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
