Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 External links modified  
1 comment  




2 Orphaned references in KGCW  
1 comment  




3 GA Review  
10 comments  


3.1  Prose, POV, and coverage  





3.2  References  





3.3  Images and copyright  





3.4  General comments  







4 Did you know nomination  
5 comments  













Talk:KGCW




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Good articleKGCW has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2023Good article nomineeListed
January 15, 2024Good topic candidateNot promoted
Did You Know

Afact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 30, 2023.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Fox television network successfully moved to strip an Iowa TV station of its affiliation?
Current status: Good article
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KGCW. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in KGCW

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of KGCW's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "tvnc-nexstarspinoffs":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 22:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:KGCW/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 13:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HiSammi Brie, I will be reviewing this article. I hope to look at this soon, but feel free to ping me if I haven't posted here in a few days. Epicgenius (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a(prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b(MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a(references):
    b(citations to reliable sources):
    c(OR):
    d(copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a(major aspects):
    b(focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a(images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b(appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Prose, POV, and coverage

[edit]

Lead:

History:

@Epicgenius: All of these issues should be resolved. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 17:17, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Technical information:

References

[edit]

Will do this in a bit. Epicgenius (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting:

Spot checks:

Epicgenius (talk) 23:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

General comments

[edit]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promotedbyBruxton (talk17:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

)

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 01:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be loggedatTemplate talk:Did you know nominations/KGCW; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Sammi Brie: Good article. Since it's available on request can I see what supports the hook. Onegreatjoke (talk) 15:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 1993: Fox network seeks to pull KJMH's affiliation. Hoth hires Chicago law firm to fight network's move.

May 1994: KJMH loses Fox network affiliation.

Approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:KGCW&oldid=1204163021"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Media and drama good articles
Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
GA-Class television articles
Low-importance television articles
GA-Class Television stations articles
Low-importance Television stations articles
Television stations task force articles
WikiProject Television articles
GA-Class United States articles
Low-importance United States articles
GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
GA-Class Iowa articles
Low-importance Iowa articles
WikiProject Iowa articles
WikiProject United States articles
 



This page was last edited on 6 February 2024, at 15:11 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki