Contents

Talk:Kejimkujik National Park

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Nova Scotia / Geography / The 10,000 Challenge Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia. This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada. This article was created or improved during The 10,000 ChallengeofWikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!! Protected areas Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

[edit]

The national historic sites component of Parks Canada is responsible for Canada's program of historical commemoration, which recognizes nationally significant places, persons and events. All such designations are made by the Minister of the Environment on the advice of the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada

Kejimkujik is accessible off Route 8, the Kejimkujik Drive, by travelling approximately 160 km from Halifax via Highway 103, 190 km from Yarmouth via Highway 101, or 90 km from Digby via Highway 101. The Seaside Adjunct is accessible from Highway 103, about 100 km south of the inland portion of the Park and 25 km southwest of Liverpool.

Added in a section about The Tent Dwellers, and a separate page on the same. Anyone who's been to Keji should pick up a copy, it's a great read and will remind you of the good times in the park... Burtonpe 19:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering if this section is appropriate for a wiki entry? --Spankr 15:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added it because it's a notable historical account of the area that became the park, describing the geography of the park, the uses of the land, and camping techniques at the time. Maybe shorten it if you want, but i think the section deserves to stay (I wrote it, so it would be odd if I thought anything else!) Burtonpe 20:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't it be more in keeping with the structure for the book to have its own wiki page and have a link to the park page and the park page have a link to it? --Spankr 14:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the Kejimikujik Lake article can be (meaningfully) expanded past the stub stage, it really should be merged into Kejimkujik National Park Kathy A. 01:14, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. --Spankr 01:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. One is a natural feature, the other an administrative structure. --Qyd 03:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point! --Spankr 23:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. It would be quite messy to attempt to incorporate the lake's history as a subset of the park's Wikipedia entry because the lake's history vastly predates the park. I think it would be quite confusing from a chronology perspective. Additionally I think Qyd's point is very valid as well. -- Canoehead 22:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kejimkujik National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113075238/http://museum.gov.ns.ca/mnh/nature/nhns/t5/t5-2.pdftohttp://museum.gov.ns.ca/mnh/nature/nhns/t5/t5-2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kejimkujik National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060603020557/http://www.friendsofkeji.ns.ca/index.shtmltohttp://www.friendsofkeji.ns.ca/index.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kejimkujik National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524211425/http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/publications/ns/ns8b/intro.htmltohttp://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/publications/ns/ns8b/intro.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524211430/http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/publications/ns/ns16b/intro.htmltohttp://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/publications/ns/ns16b/intro.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051217061221/http://www.ilec.or.jp/database/nam/nam-56.htmltohttp://www.ilec.or.jp/database/nam/nam-56.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]