This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
This page was proposed for deletionbySimonTrew (talk·contribs) on 21 April 2017 with the comment: I believe this small company (and I wish them luck) is using English Wikipedia to promote themselves. It is not a notable company. It is getting towards WP:PROMO with the number of redirects we have to it (one of which, Ketchapp Games, is at RfD at the moment). If it can't make its mind up what it is called, then I don't think it is encyclopaeidic. It was contestedbyAnarchyte (talk·contribs) on 2017-04-21 with the comment: decline prod, claims of notability have been made and the sources are there. take to afd if you want it deleted
It'll look even worse with no content. The only way around it is expansion. No real reason to split this out when the article is so short. – czar00:03, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am taking it down, as it is in justified error. I am just an app user who happens to really enjoy their apps. I am in no way connected with the company itself. I have attempted to make this article as accurate as possible from an encyclopedic point of view. If there is anything that would appear to be advertising and not just encyclopedic content, Please remove it. --Padsquad2010 (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is an error of attribution here: The article refers to source number 8 to state that Circle Pong is a Ketchapp Application, when you can see from the article itself, as well as from this link https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/circle-pong!/id905229109?mt=8 that Circle Pong is an App Cow app. The article should be corrected to reflect that although Ketchapp was accused of stealing Rotable, it turned out that Ketchapp did not own or create Circle Pong at all.
It should read as follows: "Mudloop later stated that they had learned that their submission of Zig Zag Boom to Ketchapp post-dated Ketchapp having a working version of ZigZag, and that Ketchapp was not the developer of Circle Pong, App Cow was.[8] The developer of App Cow's Circle Pong claimed to have built it as a clone of Pongo Pongo, a game which pre-dated Matt Akins' submission of Rotable to Ketchapp.[8]" Rwpowers (talk) 00:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
