Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Garfield?  
1 comment  




2 Template Theory  



2.1  Characters  



2.1.1  Traits and Props  





2.1.2  Offices in the dramatis personae  









3 Re: Santo Bugito  





4 Grammar Clean up  
1 comment  




5 SpongeBob?  
4 comments  




6 Chalkzone!?  
3 comments  




7 Tag  
1 comment  




8 Exaggerated report of demise?  
4 comments  




9 Ownership??  
1 comment  




10 A bit confused here...  
1 comment  




11 Pronunciation?  
1 comment  




12 Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page  
1 comment  




13 More information  
1 comment  




14 External links modified  
2 comments  




15 Question  
4 comments  




16 A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion  
1 comment  




17 Klasky Chew Poh  
2 comments  













Talk:Klasky Csupo




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Garfield?[edit]

It's been quite a while since I've seen Garfield related animation, but a cursory check of imdb doesn't seem to support K-C invlolvement (unless Film Roman were spun off from K-C at some point). Is this documented elsewhere? knoodelhed 06:41, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, It was just a mistake. On the season four DVD of the Simpsons, Jim Reardon said on the commentary for Homer the Heritic that it was the first episode animated by Film Roman. "Up to that point, they were animating Garfield the Cat TV specials." Someone must of misheard and mistakened it for Klasky Csupo.

Template Theory[edit]

Theree's been some speculation on the part of myself and others (as I recognize writing styles from the K-C toon articles here, and commentary on Nickdisk as well as news:alt.tv.nickelodeon) as to whether K-C actively employs templates in character and plot design. While I think there's a good deal of empirical support for a template theory, I don't think I'd name it as such or post an article about it, but I will share my observations. Mind you, this applies to the "human" toons (RR, TWT, RP, ATBG, and AGU) and not necessarily to something like Duckman, Aah! Real Monsters!, etc.

Characters[edit]

Possession of a trait doesn't necessarily correspond to a character's personality type or location within power structure. For example, Otto (RP) and little Chuckie (RR) both have unique hairstyles and wear noticeable glasses, but Otto is clearly a Leader while Chuckie is a Sidekick.

Traits and Props[edit]

Offices in the dramatis personae[edit]

Klasky Csupo

Re: Santo Bugito[edit]

Santo Bugito is misquoted as being made in 1998, when the stub it links to claims it was made in 1995. That, and it hit syndication on teletoon in 97. It's fairly old

Grammar Clean up[edit]

hi, I just read the page and it has numerous grammar errors and double negatives which make it hard to understand. For example "By 2004, Klasky Csupo shut down production on most of its shows, including Rugrats. All Grown Up! is still in production, however." So did they still make All Grown Up?. Then after it says "In 2005, Klasky Cuspo's store called it quits on 1 December." Not only is this sentance informal and not fitting for an article it doesn't make it clear if Klasky Cuspo closed down or just it's store. I would make these changes myself but not having any information on the studio any changes i would make could potentially remove important information. There is alot of potentially interesting and helpful information on this page it just needs to be cleaned up so that readers can see it clearly and easily. TheEnlightened 15:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SpongeBob?[edit]

Some of the SpongeBob SquarePants episodes have the K-C logo after it however K-C does not have anything to do with the show. It is United Plankton Pictures that produces it. Does K-C have anything to do with it?

actually, the graffiti logo had an editing mistake and was accidently put at the end of Wet Painters/Krusty Krab Training Video episodes. its now been fixed though (please bring a new logo)--68.140.73.155 (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i should fix myself. the robot logo was the one accidentally showed on those episodes. my fault 68.140.73.155 (talk) 05:42, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chalkzone!?[edit]

A one second season episode of Chalkzone have the K-C "Chicken" logo after it as the same editing mistake as the "Robot" logo. It is Frederator Studios that produces it, not the K-C logo. --Does it look like rocks to you!? 03:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the "Chicken" logo is called "Rooster". — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattBoo (talkcontribs) 20:59, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's actually pretty funny too. "WAKE UUPP!!!" LOL, I love that saying. ~I am a stegosaurus!~ —Preceding undated comment added 22:26, 23 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Tag[edit]

I removed the top tag. If someone finds anymore errors, they can bring them to my attention. Dark jedi requiem 02:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exaggerated report of demise?[edit]

Not sure if the entire company is about to go 10-7, but I do recall that the December 2005 date refertrd to the closure of K-C's giftshop (it actually ceased to function some time around Thanksgiving). True, cooltoons.com is off line and they haven't put out a newsletter in a while, but klaskycsupo.com and kachew.com are still up, and a late night phone call got their voice mail system (they are looking to hire some 3-D specialists). knoodelhed 14:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpson's mailing list just got a report of the same thing, with no source cited. Nothing on Google News, and the web site is still alive and well. --DarkAudit 20:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think Klasky Csupo is still around. See this article from animation magazine, published only a couple of weeks ago: [1] 青い(Aoi) 07:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Klasky Csupo is alive and well. Watch for their booth and lots of new shows at Kidscreen. [2]Rwf5 22:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership??[edit]

I don't remember Klasky-Csupo being under the ownership of anyone but Gabor-Csupo and Arlene Klasky. Will someone profile sufficent proof of 20th Century Fox and Nickelodeon ownership otherwise I'll be deleting this. Dancing is Forbidden (talk) 02:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's not likely, but it could be possible. Because, Klasky-Csupo provided the animation for the first three seasons of The Simpsons (along with the Tracey Ullman shorts), and Nick and K-C struck a pretty good deal of making animated Nicktoons for Nick. But being owned by Fox and Nick is VERY unlikely, even though K-C did take certain parts for both companies. ~MattBoo

A bit confused here...[edit]

It says the 3rd logo was last seen in "Rugrats in Austraila" which says was first shown next year (2011)???

Then the 4th has the same general confusion to it... 67.172.25.175 (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation?[edit]

The pronunciation of 'Csupó' in this article differs from that in Csupó's own article. Which is correct? magentafeelings (talk) 11:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More information[edit]

I want more information about the Klasky Csupo production endings and the Klasky Csupo robot guy.

Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Klasky Csupo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Klasky Csupo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C094:1EE0:7D79:1691:60B5:C0FC (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Could everyone tell me the reason why the descriptions about the criticisms of KC’s artstyle need to be removed from this article and the Ronald McDonald thing? Personally, it’s true the studio is notable for most of its animations with the very gross and weird-looking character designs, including with deformed heads, ugly haircuts, and sometimes with disgusting lips and tiny eyes, and I especially don’t like the character designs from The Wild Thorneberrys and As Told by Ginger, I honestly find them hideous (no matter how decent the concept and voice acting are), which makes Netflix’s Big Mouth has beautiful character designs! Wiki-Ikiw (talk) 15:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is my favorite logo.

I am making a sparta remix of him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joaomarbleraces (talkcontribs) 16:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On vegas pro 15.0, i guess — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joaomarbleraces (talkcontribs) 16:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i am currently on the madness, which VEGAS lagged and freezed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joaomarbleraces (talkcontribs) 17:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Klasky Chew Poh[edit]

Klasky Csupo 2603:900A:1B00:ACBC:D513:2ECD:B29:B4D8 (talk) 22:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What? Chiagozie Elobuike (talk) 03:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Klasky_Csupo&oldid=1205060542"

Categories: 
C-Class company articles
Low-importance company articles
WikiProject Companies articles
C-Class Animation articles
Mid-importance Animation articles
C-Class Animation articles of Mid-importance
C-Class American animation articles
Mid-importance American animation articles
American animation work group articles
WikiProject Animation articles
C-Class California articles
Low-importance California articles
C-Class Los Angeles articles
Low-importance Los Angeles articles
Los Angeles area task force articles
WikiProject California articles
C-Class television articles
High-importance television articles
C-Class Nickelodeon articles
High-importance Nickelodeon articles
Nickelodeon task force articles
WikiProject Television articles
C-Class The Simpsons articles
Low-importance The Simpsons articles
C-Class The Simpsons articles of Low-importance
WikiProject The Simpsons articles
C-Class film articles
C-Class filmmaking articles
Filmmaking task force articles
C-Class American cinema articles
American cinema task force articles
WikiProject Film articles
C-Class United States articles
Low-importance United States articles
C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
Low-importance American animation articles
Low-importance American cinema articles
C-Class American television articles
Low-importance American television articles
American television task force articles
WikiProject United States articles
 



This page was last edited on 8 February 2024, at 19:22 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki